Tom Uram and Monica,
This will be scheduled for July 12 at 10 Pacific time. I am not sure who all
to include in the agschedule.
Can you do this for me and I will check when I come back. For sure Brookhaven
and LBNL. Mike O'Conner will be speaking from Brookhaven and Greg Bell will be
helping with questions from LBNL.
Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Sounds good for me.
Monika
Hello All,
Greg and everyone else is this date good for you. I will
be going on vacation starting tomorrow and I will not be
back until the end of June. Hopefully we can decide if
this date is good, if not I will send email when I get
back from vacation. Thank you,
Mike
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Michael,
The following week is good, Tuesday July 12 at 8AM
USPacific. Yes I have been getting suggestions, I can
never be sure that I've gotten all though.
-moc
Michael Elmore wrote:
Hello Mike O'Connor,
Is there another date that is good for you? We could
still have the >> meeting at 8 pacific. Is that time
good for you. If we have it then >> some of the people
in Europe could come. I think it would be a >> little
late for Asia though. >> Thanks
Mike
PS. I am assuming you have been getting all of the
suggestions >>
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Mike,
Prior to replying to you I checked the LBL Holiday
schedule but >>> neglected to check the BNL holiday
schedule. >>> BNL is closed July 5th so I would not be
able to use the AG node >>> that day.
(I'll use my initials since there are too many Mikes
on this thread) >>> -moc
Michael Elmore wrote:
sorry about that. I did mean July 5.
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike meant July 5th Townhall.
-Monika
Tom,
Monica Rabarison expressed an interest in having a
meeting >>>>>> to discuss mutlicast issues and
troubleshooting for the >>>>>> access grid. (see below
some of the email we have been >>>>>> sending.) I have
found two people who are willing to >>>>>> participate in
this. Mike O'Conner from ESNet and Greg Bell from >>>>>>
LBLNet. Mike is willing to give the >>>>>> presentation
and Greg is willing to help answer >>>>>> questions. The
first question is can this be done at the >>>>>> 8 am
townhall on July 7 (Mike can only do the 8 am
presentation) >>>>>> The second question is what kind of
discussion do you think would be good to present.
Thank you,
Mike
Mike O'Connor wrote:
Mike,
Sure, July 5 for the 8AM pacific meeting is fine,
I'll >>>>>>> have to decline the later meeting.
We should talk about the audience and topic of
discussion. >
-Mike
Michael Elmore wrote:
Mike,
I just heard from Greg and he said that July 5 is
ok >>>>>>>>
with him. He >> also said he would be willing to
attend >>>>>> and help answer questions. >> Mike would
you be willing >>>>>> and could you have a presentation
available >> by July 5? >>>>>> Also, there are usually
two meetings for the town hall. >>>>>>
One at 8 am pacific and one at 4 pm pacific.
Could >>>>>>>>
you and would >> you be willing to do both
meetings. If >>>>>> you can only do the morning >> one
it would be fine. >>>>>>
Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi Mike,
July 5th is fine for me.
Thanks,
Monika
Monica et al.,
I was wondering if it would be ok to do the
meeting >>>>>>>>>>
at the >>>> July 5 townhall. I will be on
vacation for >>>>>> all of the >>>> dates you listed. Is
this ok for MIke >>>>>> and Greg? >>>> Thank you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi all,
Any date/time except June 10, 13, and 17
is
fine for >>>>>>>>>>>
me. >>>>>
Thanks,
Monika
Hello Greg and MIke,
I received this from Monika about the
content
of >>>>>>>>>>>>
the >>>>>> meeting. The date is not set. If you
can't >>>>>> meet at >>>>>> Brookhaven on the 7th, then we
could schedule this >>>>>> for >>>>>> another time.
Monika, do you >>>>>> have another date in mind? >>>>>>
Thank you, Mike >>>>>>
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike,
the session is mainly intended for
network
personel but >>>>>>>
node >ops too could benefit from it.
When the
idea >>>>>>>>>>>>
came >>>>>>
up >>, what >everyone wanted was mostly
about
how to >>>>>>>>>>
know >>>> that >>there is a >multicast problem and
how to >>>>>> fix the >>>> problem, >>and also >re-explain
how the AG is >>>>>> using >>>> multicast. There >>is
already >an AGDP doc >>>>>> about these but >>>>
apparently >>everyone (mostly node >>>>>>
operators) wanted to >>>> have the >>network
people >>>>>>>
attend such a >session. It looks >>>> like in
many cases >>>>>> , the network person is >not very >>>>
familiar with >>the >>>>>> AG and the node operator is not
very >>>> familiar with >>>>>>
networking! How technical it should be? >>>>
I'm not very sure >>about this. >
Thanks again,
Monika
Monica,
I have talked to Greg and he is
not sure
what he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
can >>>>>>>> prepare for a meeting like this. How
technical he >>>>>>>>
can >>>>make it etc. He would like to know
more
specifically >>>>
what >>you would like to get out of a
multicast >>>>>>>>>>>> presentation. >>Thank you and have
a good weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Mike,
Please do so. June 7 sounds
good to me. If
it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
too >>>>>>>>>
close >for the presenter(s) any
time would
do, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
guess. >>>>
Thanks again,
Monika
Monica,
Would you like me to ask
the networking
people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
if >>>>>>>>>>
they >>>>>>would like to give a
presentation?
If so >>>>>>>>>>
then >>>> maybe >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
they >>could do the
presentation at the
next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Town >>>>>>>>
Hall >>>>
on >>June >>7. One of the people
might have
a >>>>>>>>>>>>
problem with 8 >>>>>> >>am, but >>I can find out.
Let me >>>>>> know or let >>>>>>
me >>know >>about another >>time. Thank
you,
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Mike,
Thank you indeed for
your response. You
are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
right >>>>>>>>>>>
nobody >>>
has >replied to this
suggestion yet. I am
cc-ing >>>>>>>>>>
Alex >>>>>>
as >>>>they are >also interested in
such a
session >>>>>>>>>>>>
at >>>>>> TACC. >>>>Having the talk >on a Town Hall
is a >>>>>> great >>>>>>
idea. >>I am >>>>thinking that the >summer
might not >>>>>>>>>>
be a >>>> good >>time as >>>>people go on vacation.
Anyway, we >>>> could have >>it >>>>
whenever >>the speakers are
>available.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Best Regards,
Monika
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Monika,
Sorry for not responding to this
earlier. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
haven't >>>>>>>>
seen >>any other
responses either. I am
not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
willing >>>>>>
to >>>>lead >>such a meeting, but I am
willing to >>>>>>>>>>>>
try >>>>>>
and >>get >>>>
a >>speaker >>for you. One of
the Network
people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
at >>>>>>>>
LBNL >>is >>quite >>versed in
Multicasting
and I >>>>>>>>>>>>
think >>>>>> that he >>might >>be >>willing to
give a >>>>>> talk and I >>>>>>
could >>try to >>get the >>person >>at ESNet
who >>>>>>>>>
isolates >>>> the >>multicast >>troubles on
ESNet. >>Let >>>>>> me know what you >>>> >>think.
Maybe >>it could be >>>>>>
done on a >>Town Hall >>>>
meeting. Thank you, >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mike
monika.k.rabarison wrote:
Hi everybody,
A suggestion poped up at the AG
retreat on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
organizing >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
an >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
AG >session for network staff.
The idea is to have one person or more
share >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
knowledge, >>>>>how-tos, tips,
etc...on AG
network >>>>>>>> support. How does >>>>>
that >>>sound? Is there
anyone out there
willing to >>>>>>>>>>
lead >>>>such >>>session? Node
operators too
would >>>>>>>>>>>>
indeed >>benefit >>>>
from it >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
as >some of us (at least myself)are not
very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
network >>>>>>>>"literate". >
Thanks,
Monika
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
