Probably now onwards NET exam wont be conducted by CBSE. Hopefully exam taking authorities understand the issue and they make whole exam process accessible to visually impaired.
On 12/19/17, Kanchan Pamnani <kanchanpamn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you all for responding so urgently and with so much information on > Thursday evening. > > I had thought that the Friday meeting would probably be the last but.. > > Sub committees would be set up to look at issues concerning each disability > and then all the issues would be looked at comprehensively. > > Overall the mood was against barring private scribes or putting > restrictions.Phew what a relief. > > Staff Selection Board mentioned that they had conducted exams on computer > and the scribe would only have to read the question and click the answer > suggested by the vi examinee. When I asked them why they hadn't made the > questions accessible, their reply was that they had so many examinees. I > think we will have to follow this up while we wait for the next meeting. > > D O P T said that on the last occasion 4 recruitees out of 11 in the VI > category had to be disqualified because they were found not to be disabled. > The UPSE conducts the preliminary exam and then the main and then the > interview. After the interview candidates are examined by a medical board > and in this medical boardfound that the candidates had doubtful > certificates. These cases were then referred to another medical board which > came to the conclusion that these be disqualified candidates had wrong > certificates. D O P T said that this whole process costs time and money. > > Friends this is embarrassing- we do obtain fake medical certificates. We > will all have to introspect and see that we don't get these certificates > and > we don't allow our friends to get them too. Of course there is a penal > action in the new law but as we all know that process will take time and > energy and wont be a deterrent to others for a while. > > UGC stated that they don't conduct NET since 2014 and CBSE does it for > them. They have agreed to ask CBSE not to ask for scribes names so much in > advance. It seems that CBSE asked for details of scribes 8 months in > advance. This was positive. > > Other issues also got discussed but the aforementioned were the most > important issues. > > Kartik I need to see the judgement in your matter. From what I have > understood from Neha this is a horrible judgement on the alternative > question issue. I wish I had known we could have challenged it. > > > > Friends once again thank you for your support and your knowledge. > > Kanchan > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > http://www.avg.com > The list has now migrated to www.accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > > You should now post to the id: a...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > > > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > -- Mohib Anwar Rafay Phone: +919 555 555 765 The list has now migrated to www.accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in You should now post to the id: a...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
