Ketan
Non implementation is your headache and that of the NGO and then the court 
is always open. Cant put it in the Policy.  .
Kanchan Pamnani
Advocate & Solicitor
9, Suleman Chambers,
Battery Street, Colaba,
Mumbai - 400 039.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ketan Kothari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pamnani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent


> Dear Kanchan,
>
> It is an excellent document except that there should be a provision
> for viva exam in certain cases where the use of graphs is immense and
> those of us who are totally blind by birth find it difficult to read
> them.
>
> Further, after this policy comes into effect the nonimplementing body
> such as the school/colleges/universities should invalidate the
> examination and they should reorganize the same as the disabled person
> looses the marks as it happened in my own case.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On 11/29/07, pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Friends
>> Have drafted a Policy for Examinations of the Visually disabled in India
>> thanks to the input from Anjali, Asif, Dipendra, Harish, Ketan,  Neha,
>> Pranav,  Rajesh, Sam and SGS Sisodia and numerous others who helped when 
>> the
>> Maharashtra Guidelines were being framed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me have your comments on this draft urgently and no later than
>> this evening. I need to send it to the Disability commission.
>> thanks Kanchan
>>
>>
>> Policy for Examination of the Visually Disabled
>>
>>
>> The need for a standard and comprehensive Policy throughout India for the
>> examination of the Visually Disabled has been growing since:
>>
>>
>>
>>   a.. Every year more and more Visually Disabled candidates are appearing
>> for various examinations.
>>   b.. Number of examining bodies has been increasing over the years
>>
>>
>>   a.. Various orders/judgments/directions have been passed by various
>> Courts/Commissions/Authorities and deal with the problem in piecemeal.
>>
>>
>>   a.. Various examination conducting authorities have different rules 
>> and/or
>> implement the rules in different ways.
>>
>>
>>   a.. Technology is improving and needs to be taken into account
>>
>>
>>   a.. The anxiety suffered by the examinees before and during the
>> examination has to be removed
>>
>>
>>   a.. Questions asked at written examinations and the examinations
>> themselves are varied and need to be answered in various ways.
>>
>>
>>   a.. Competition is increasing and the Visually Disabled have to be 
>> given a
>> level playing field
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This Policy will apply to all examinations being conducted in India
>> generally and specifically to examinations conducted by Educational
>> institutions- schools and  colleges (both internal and external), School 
>> and
>> College Boards, universities and deemed universities, autonomous bodies
>> conducting entrance or promotional examinations as well as all
>> recruiting/promoting  authorities and any other authorities or bodies 
>> under
>> which a Visually Disabled examinee wishes to appear for an examination 
>> for
>> any purpose whatsoever. The paramount purpose of the Policy is to 
>> alleviate
>> the hardship being caused to the Visually disabled candidate due to
>> uncertainty in policy and to mitigate the effects of a disability.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Scribe
>>
>>
>> a. The Visually Disabled candidate must be allowed the use of a Scribe 
>> who
>> will read the question papers and write/type the answers dictated by the
>> Visually disabled candidate.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. Since one of the important factors while doing an examination is 
>> speed,
>> adequate practice is necessary, Visually Disabled persons should be 
>> allowed
>> to use the services of a scribe of his/her own choice. The Visually 
>> Disabled
>> candidate may however request the Examining authority to provide a 
>> Scribe.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. The discretion to arrange for his/her own Scribe or to be provided by 
>> a
>> Scribe by the Examining Authority is with the candidate alone.
>>
>>
>>
>> d. No other restriction other than those mentioned in Clauses 3 or 4 
>> herein
>> below should be imposed on the selection of a scribe.
>>
>>
>>
>> e. It is desirable that the candidate and the scribe are from the same
>> stream.
>>
>>
>> 2. Examination Form/Application
>>
>>
>> a. All Application Forms/Advertisements for exams should mention that a
>> Visually Disabled candidate will be allowed the use of a Scribe and
>> alternative formats will be provided.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. The examining authority should give a clear option in the 
>> advertisement
>> itself whether the examinee wishes the scribe to be provided by the
>> examination conducting body or he/she wishes to arrange the scribe on
>> his/her own.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. The Examining authority at the time of advertisement/application 
>> should
>> also print the criteria/qualification for scribe to be followed.
>>
>>
>>
>> d. The application form should have a provision asking low vision persons 
>> to
>> indicate the requirement of question paper in large print.  The
>> advertisement for examination as well as the application form should also
>> clearly mention that the low vision persons would be allowed the use of
>> magnifying glass.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. Scribes chosen by Candidate
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> a. In case the candidate avails the services of his/her own 
>> scribe/writer,
>> the scribe/writer   should be one grade junior in academic qualification
>> than the candidate if from the same stream.  However, this condition 
>> shall
>> not apply if the scribe/writer is from a different stream.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. For competitive examinations the scribe needs to be one level below 
>> the
>> eligibility criteria of the competitive exam in consideration.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. For internal exams of schools and colleges the condition of the scribe
>> being one grade junior in academic qualification than the candidate 
>> should
>> not be enforced strictly as this would cause undue hardship to the 
>> candidate
>> and give rise to unviable solutions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. Scribes provided by Examining Authorities
>>
>>
>>
>> a. Considering the practical problems, it is necessary that even if the
>> scribe is provided by the examination conducting authorities, at the 
>> request
>> of examinee, such authorities must ensure the competence of the
>> scribe/writer. If the scribe is provided by the examining authorities, it
>> should be ensured that the scribe is adequately qualified to understand 
>> the
>> questions and to explain them to the candidate.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. To ensure the competence of such a scribe provided, the following
>> conditions should be adhered to:
>>
>>
>>
>> i.           as far as possible and practical, the scribe himself/herself
>> should be a current student;
>>
>>
>>
>> ii.          In any case, the time interval between when such a scribe
>> ceased to be a student himself/herself and the time he/she is acting as a
>> scribe should not be more than three years, because with the lapse of 
>> time,
>> natural abilities of a student like writing speed, taking dictation and
>> writing an examination efficiently in a specified time frame, suffer a
>> considerable decline. However strict adherence to this requirement cannot 
>> be
>> stretched beyond a logical point.
>>
>>
>>
>> iii.        The medium of instruction of the scribe in his/her studies
>> should essentially be, or have been, the same as the examinee.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> iv.        Scribe should, as far as possible, belong to the same stream 
>> as
>> the examinee.
>>
>> v.         In cases where the scribe is provided by exam conducting 
>> bodies
>> at the request of the examinee, she/he should not have scored below 55%
>> marks in the last exam.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. The examining body should identify the scribes/writers and make the
>> panels at district/Division or state level as per requirement of
>> examination.
>>
>>
>>
>> d. The Panels of scribe should be as per requirement of the
>> stream/discipline eg. Arts, Commerce, Science & Mathematics, Engineering,
>> Medical etc. and only eligible scribes should be included in the panel.
>>
>>
>>
>> 5. Supervision
>>
>>
>>
>> Any attempt at cheating and other malpractices can be curbed by ensuring
>> proper supervision and vigilance by the invigilators. This is the
>> responsibility of the Examining Authority. No restrictions should be 
>> imposed
>> on the choice of a scribe by a candidate on this account.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 6. Additional time
>>
>> a.                   The facility of Additional time must be allotted to 
>> all
>> Visually Disabled candidates appearing for examinations in any format 
>> with
>> or without the use of a Scribe.
>>
>> b.                  For a written test of duration of 1 hour at least 20
>> minutes extra time should be allotted.
>>
>> c.                   Similarly For written tests involving more than one 
>> or
>> less than one hour extra time should be worked out on the basis of 20
>> minutes per one hour criteria.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 7. Arrangements at the Examination
>>
>>
>>
>> a. Proper sitting arrangement should be made before commencement of the
>> examination so as to avoid confusion and distraction.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. Sitting arrangements for the disabled candidates should be made on the
>> ground floor, as far as possible.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. Refreshments, if any to scribes/writers should either are served 
>> before
>> or after the examination and not during the examination.
>>
>>
>>
>> d. The Chief invigilator of the examination center should have 
>> discretionary
>> powers to accept last minute change of scribes under exigencies.
>>
>>
>>
>> e. Considering the fact that many exams are held in overlapping schedules
>> and also the fact that the scribes may not be free/willing to commit
>> themselves for the entire duration of exam or examination of various
>> languages, more than one person may be permitted to write different 
>> papers
>> for the same examination, provided they fulfill all other conditions laid
>> down in clauses 3 or 4 above. For enacting such a change in scribes for
>> different papers, the ground of contingency should not be a mandatory
>> requirement.
>>
>>
>>
>> f. The letter approving the scribe should contain the following 
>> information
>> in writing:
>>
>> i. The extra time given to the candidate
>>
>> ii. He shall be seated separately
>>
>> iii. Contact address and phone number of competent authority should also 
>> be
>> printed for last minute change of scribe.
>>
>>
>>
>> g. To minimize the need for last minute change in the scribe and in view 
>> of
>> (e) above, a collective sanction letter may be issued, sanctioning 
>> multiple
>> scribes proposed by the examinee, so that any of them may be called upon 
>> to
>> act as the scribe in any particular paper, without the hassle of 
>> formalities
>> involved in changing the scribe at the eleventh hour.
>>
>>
>>
>> h. Candidate, scribe and supervisor should be provided with full 
>> information
>> about the duration of the examination.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 8. Aids and appliances
>>
>>
>>
>> a. a. All Visually Disabled candidates may be allowed to carry special
>> mathematical aids such as Taylor's frame or abacus as they have no other 
>> way
>> of calculating sums.  Neither abacus nor Taylor's frame calculate the 
>> sums
>> but are mere aids such as a paper for candidates with vision.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. in papers such as accounts the visually disabled candidate may be 
>> allowed
>> to carry Braille slates and papers for writing the numbers as it is
>> difficult to remember the balance sheets
>>
>>
>>
>> c. The visually disabled candidate should also be allowed to use optical/
>> electronic low vision aids such as magnifying glass;
>>
>>
>>
>> 9. Alternative Formats
>>
>>
>>
>> a. In addition to the facility of a scribe the Visually Disabled 
>> candidates
>> have the facility to write answers in Braille or on a computer or a
>> typewriter or may ask for question paper in large font.
>>
>> b. The answer paper in Braille should be evaluated by the 
>> expert/examiners
>> in Braille script. If possible the question paper may be provided in 
>> Braille
>> or in digital text.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. The font size of the question paper should not be less than 20 for the
>> benefit of low vision candidates.
>>
>>
>>
>> d. Considering the developments in technology, all examination conducting
>> bodies should facilitate the use of computers for taking the exams by the
>> visually Disabled examinees, if the candidate so desires.
>>
>> e. Visually Disabled candidates appearing for "Open book Exams may be
>> provided the texts of such books in Braille, in digital format on the
>> computer or in large text at the choice of the candidate.
>>
>> 10. Alternative Questions
>>
>> a. Alternative questions must be provided in cases where the original
>> question contains visual elements and/or require the candidate to 
>> interpret
>> or produce such visual elements. However the candidate may elect to 
>> answer
>> the original question.
>>
>>
>>
>> b. Wherever possible, the visual graphs should be supplemented by
>> descriptive explanation of the graphs for visually Disabled candidates.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. For practical exams the Visually Disabled candidate must be allowed 
>> the
>> help of a laboratory  assistant to conduct the experiment and or be 
>> provided
>> alternative oral questions in place of the experiment to be conducted.
>>
>>
>>
>> 11. Examination on Computers
>>
>> a. Visually Disabled candidates can appear in examination on the computer
>> only if students are computer literate and can type at least at the speed 
>> of
>> 30 words per minute. The software and hardware is now available to make
>> students write their examinations both in Hindi and English mediums
>>
>>
>>
>> b. This form of examination is preferable than the use of scribes due to 
>> the
>> following reasons:
>>
>>
>>
>> i. High payments being demanded by Scribes
>>
>> ii. Wasting crucial time just before the examinations just to look for
>> scribes.
>>
>> iii. Sexual harassment of girl students.
>>
>> iv. Losing marks due to mistakes of scribes or casual attitude of 
>> scribes.
>>
>> v. Week students getting away with good marks by making their scribes 
>> write
>> answers to questions that they do not know.
>>
>>
>>
>> c. The use of computers for examination does not mean that a scribe to 
>> read
>> the question paper is dispensed with. However the candidate may not 
>> require
>> a sighted person and dispense with the same.
>>
>>
>>
>> d. The responsibility to bring a computer is not on the student/ 
>> candidate.
>> The centre/ Examining authority shall spare one of its own Computers for 
>> the
>> exam.
>>
>>
>>
>> e. However if it is feasible then the candidate may be allowed to use his
>> own computer. This may be decided by the candidate and the examining
>> authority mutually.
>>
>>
>>
>> f. the only responsibility that a student aspiring to give exam on 
>> computer
>> has, is to bring the screen reading software.
>>
>>
>>
>> g. The candidate should be allowed to install the screen reading software 
>> a
>> day in advance on the computer provided with printer installed
>>
>> h. recommended Equipment preparation:
>>
>>
>>
>> i. For each candidate appearing in the examination two computers may be 
>> set
>> up for this purpose. One for writing the examination and one as stand-by 
>> in
>> case of any failure in the machine.
>>
>> ii. The computer must have the following software installed:
>>
>>
>>
>> A.        MS Office
>>
>> B.         Page maker 6
>>
>> C.        Jaws for windows screen reading software.
>>
>>
>>
>> iii. The medium of examination for the student can be in English or Hindi 
>> .
>>
>> iv. All the data on the Computer must be password protected using the
>> utility software called Folder Access. This software can make any folder
>> access limited by password.
>>
>>
>>
>>   6.. UPS with back-up of 2 hours must be installed at the centre.
>>   7.. Vi. Two printers may be kept for taking the final print-outs of the
>> answer sheets.
>>
>>
>> i. Recommended procedure for examination:
>>
>>
>>
>> i. The computer centre or the library may be designated as one of the
>> examination centres for conducting the examination.
>>
>>
>>
>> ii. Question paper must be sent to this Centre on a CD.
>>
>> iii. The question paper may be sent in the page-maker file format.
>>
>> iv. The paper then requires to be converted into a MS word file. The
>> original file may be opened in the page maker software. Each page of the
>> question paper must be copied and pasted in the MS word document.
>>
>> v. if the candidate is appearing in English Medium,  the Jaws software 
>> may
>> speak gibberish where Hindi text appears, all Hindi language text must be
>> deleted from the question paper.
>>
>> vi. This MS word file must be password protected.
>>
>> vii. Answer sheet- One blank MS-word document may be created on the 
>> Computer
>> and shortcut to this may be created on the desk-top. This blank document
>> must have the paper size and margins set according to the extension 
>> sheets
>> of the answer sheet on which the final print-out will be taken. Viii. The
>> role-number and other details of the candidate must be filled on the
>> original sheet by the invigilator using normal pen. These extension 
>> sheets
>> must be stapled with each sheet of the original answer sheet. Each sheet
>> must be signed by the invigilator.
>>
>>
>>
>>   8.. The candidate must be allowed to have access to the Computer 10
>> minutes before the start of examination time.
>>   9.. X. At the time of start of examination, the password for the 
>> question
>> paper file must be told to the candidate.
>> 12. Other Disabled Candidates
>>
>>
>>
>> Although the aforesaid guidelines are specifically for Visually disabled
>> candidates these guidelines may be used by the Examining authorities 
>> while
>> conducting examinations for other candidates suffering from disability
>> whether permanent or temporary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> with
>> the subject unsubscribe.
>>
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, 
>> please
>> visit the list home page at
>> 
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Ketan Kothari
> Phone: [r] 24223281,
> Cell: 9833911866
> MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Skype ID: Ketan3333
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, 
> please visit the list home page at
>  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
> 


To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to