The examinee may be allowed to bring his own screen reading /magnification 
software
Rohit
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Abdul Razique Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent


> Hello kanchan mam,
> you are doing a really commendable job. It is a well drafted policy 
> barring
> few of the points which are debatable.
> 1. I stand by Pranav sir's point, of allowing extra 30 minutes per hour
> instead of 20 minutes.
> 2. As far as the softwares are concerned, in my opinion no softwares must 
> be
> specified as said by Puneet sir. The college/ university should provide 
> the
> softwares which the candidate demands for. this is because all candidates
> may not be comfortable with the specified softwares.
>
> Carry on this good work,
> Abdul
> -- Original Message ----- 
> From: "AMIT BHATT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent
>
>
>> In my opinion, when scribe is one level junior than the applicant,
>> deciding
>> the marks in percentage for writer seems illogical to me.
>> Specially, when the scribe is taken from the different stream. Therefore,
>> the candidate should be allowed to use subscribe with whatever maximum
>> percentage of marks.
>> In addition, I would support Pranav's point that extra 30 minutes per 
>> hour
>> should be given instead of 20 minutes to the applicant.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Amit Bhatt
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "sweety bhalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent
>>
>>
>>> Moreover the scribe with 55 % marks for examinations, it is very
>>> difficult
>>> to get in this time.  It should be at least 60%marks.  Telling my own
>>> experience and facing problems in my dept examinations.
>>> Regards
>>> (Sweety Bhalla)
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Vetrivel Adhimoolam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: pamnani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
>>> Sent: 29/11/2007 8:56 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent
>>>
>>> > Hello Kanchan,
>>> >
>>> > It is certainly a well drafted policy. It pretty much covers
>>> > everything.
>>> But
>>> > a couple of suggestions though: The policy also should include
>> sufficient
>>> > guidelines describing what should be done in the event of certain
>>> > delays
>>> as
>>> > the result of computer problems or the malfunctioning of the software.
>>> > Because things can go wrong on that front and visually challenged
>>> candidates
>>> > should not suffer as the result of such issues. So in my view, the
>>> > software/hardware requirements should be amended to be inclusive of
>>> > this
>>> > issue. Second, visually impaired candidates are also increasingly
>>> appearing
>>> > on various exams that require solving of extensive mathematical
>> problems.
>>> > Some of those exams may actually allow regular students to use
>> calculator
>>> > and in such circumstances, visually challenged candidates also should
>>> > be
>>> > allowed to bring talking calculator in to the examination hall.
>>> >
>>> > Vetri.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: pamnani
>>> > To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:04 PM
>>> > Subject: [AI] Draft policy for exams urgent
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi Friends
>>> > Have drafted a Policy for Examinations of the Visually disabled in
>>> > India
>>> > thanks to the input from Anjali, Asif, Dipendra, Harish, Ketan,  Neha,
>>> > Pranav,  Rajesh, Sam and SGS Sisodia and numerous others who helped
>>> > when
>>> the
>>> > Maharashtra Guidelines were being framed.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Please let me have your comments on this draft urgently and no later
>> than
>>> > this evening. I need to send it to the Disability commission.
>>> > thanks Kanchan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Policy for Examination of the Visually Disabled
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The need for a standard and comprehensive Policy throughout India for
>> the
>>> > examination of the Visually Disabled has been growing since:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. Every year more and more Visually Disabled candidates are
>> appearing
>>> > for various examinations.
>>> >   b.. Number of examining bodies has been increasing over the years
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. Various orders/judgments/directions have been passed by various
>>> > Courts/Commissions/Authorities and deal with the problem in piecemeal.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. Various examination conducting authorities have different rules
>>> and/or
>>> > implement the rules in different ways.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. Technology is improving and needs to be taken into account
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. The anxiety suffered by the examinees before and during the
>>> > examination has to be removed
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. Questions asked at written examinations and the examinations
>>> > themselves are varied and need to be answered in various ways.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   a.. Competition is increasing and the Visually Disabled have to be
>> given
>>> a
>>> > level playing field
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > This Policy will apply to all examinations being conducted in India
>>> > generally and specifically to examinations conducted by Educational
>>> > institutions- schools and  colleges (both internal and external),
>>> > School
>>> and
>>> > College Boards, universities and deemed universities, autonomous 
>>> > bodies
>>> > conducting entrance or promotional examinations as well as all
>>> > recruiting/promoting  authorities and any other authorities or bodies
>>> under
>>> > which a Visually Disabled examinee wishes to appear for an examination
>> for
>>> > any purpose whatsoever. The paramount purpose of the Policy is to
>>> alleviate
>>> > the hardship being caused to the Visually disabled candidate due to
>>> > uncertainty in policy and to mitigate the effects of a disability.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 1. Scribe
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. The Visually Disabled candidate must be allowed the use of a Scribe
>> who
>>>
>>> > will read the question papers and write/type the answers dictated by
>>> > the
>>> > Visually disabled candidate.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. Since one of the important factors while doing an examination is
>> speed,
>>> > adequate practice is necessary, Visually Disabled persons should be
>>> allowed
>>> > to use the services of a scribe of his/her own choice. The Visually
>>> Disabled
>>> > candidate may however request the Examining authority to provide a
>> Scribe.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. The discretion to arrange for his/her own Scribe or to be provided
>>> > by
>> a
>>> > Scribe by the Examining Authority is with the candidate alone.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > d. No other restriction other than those mentioned in Clauses 3 or 4
>>> herein
>>> > below should be imposed on the selection of a scribe.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > e. It is desirable that the candidate and the scribe are from the same
>>> > stream.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2. Examination Form/Application
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. All Application Forms/Advertisements for exams should mention that 
>>> > a
>>> > Visually Disabled candidate will be allowed the use of a Scribe and
>>> > alternative formats will be provided.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. The examining authority should give a clear option in the
>> advertisement
>>> > itself whether the examinee wishes the scribe to be provided by the
>>> > examination conducting body or he/she wishes to arrange the scribe on
>>> > his/her own.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. The Examining authority at the time of advertisement/application
>> should
>>> > also print the criteria/qualification for scribe to be followed.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > d. The application form should have a provision asking low vision
>> persons
>>> to
>>> > indicate the requirement of question paper in large print.  The
>>> > advertisement for examination as well as the application form should
>> also
>>> > clearly mention that the low vision persons would be allowed the use 
>>> > of
>>> > magnifying glass.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 3. Scribes chosen by Candidate
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. In case the candidate avails the services of his/her own
>> scribe/writer,
>>> > the scribe/writer   should be one grade junior in academic
>>> > qualification
>>> > than the candidate if from the same stream.  However, this condition
>> shall
>>> > not apply if the scribe/writer is from a different stream.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. For competitive examinations the scribe needs to be one level below
>> the
>>> > eligibility criteria of the competitive exam in consideration.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. For internal exams of schools and colleges the condition of the
>> scribe
>>> > being one grade junior in academic qualification than the candidate
>> should
>>> > not be enforced strictly as this would cause undue hardship to the
>>> candidate
>>> > and give rise to unviable solutions.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 4. Scribes provided by Examining Authorities
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. Considering the practical problems, it is necessary that even if 
>>> > the
>>> > scribe is provided by the examination conducting authorities, at the
>>> request
>>> > of examinee, such authorities must ensure the competence of the
>>> > scribe/writer. If the scribe is provided by the examining authorities,
>> it
>>> > should be ensured that the scribe is adequately qualified to 
>>> > understand
>>> the
>>> > questions and to explain them to the candidate.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. To ensure the competence of such a scribe provided, the following
>>> > conditions should be adhered to:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i.           as far as possible and practical, the scribe
>> himself/herself
>>> > should be a current student;
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ii.          In any case, the time interval between when such a scribe
>>> > ceased to be a student himself/herself and the time he/she is acting 
>>> > as
>> a
>>> > scribe should not be more than three years, because with the lapse of
>>> time,
>>> > natural abilities of a student like writing speed, taking dictation 
>>> > and
>>> > writing an examination efficiently in a specified time frame, suffer a
>>> > considerable decline. However strict adherence to this requirement
>> cannot
>>> be
>>> > stretched beyond a logical point.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > iii.        The medium of instruction of the scribe in his/her studies
>>> > should essentially be, or have been, the same as the examinee.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > iv.        Scribe should, as far as possible, belong to the same 
>>> > stream
>> as
>>> > the examinee.
>>> >
>>> > v.         In cases where the scribe is provided by exam conducting
>> bodies
>>> > at the request of the examinee, she/he should not have scored below 
>>> > 55%
>>> > marks in the last exam.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. The examining body should identify the scribes/writers and make the
>>> > panels at district/Division or state level as per requirement of
>>> > examination.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > d. The Panels of scribe should be as per requirement of the
>>> > stream/discipline eg. Arts, Commerce, Science & Mathematics,
>> Engineering,
>>> > Medical etc. and only eligible scribes should be included in the 
>>> > panel.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 5. Supervision
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Any attempt at cheating and other malpractices can be curbed by
>>> > ensuring
>>> > proper supervision and vigilance by the invigilators. This is the
>>> > responsibility of the Examining Authority. No restrictions should be
>>> imposed
>>> > on the choice of a scribe by a candidate on this account.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 6. Additional time
>>> >
>>> > a.                   The facility of Additional time must be allotted
>>> > to
>>> all
>>> > Visually Disabled candidates appearing for examinations in any format
>> with
>>> > or without the use of a Scribe.
>>> >
>>> > b.                  For a written test of duration of 1 hour at least
>>> > 20
>>> > minutes extra time should be allotted.
>>> >
>>> > c.                   Similarly For written tests involving more than
>>> > one
>>> or
>>> > less than one hour extra time should be worked out on the basis of 20
>>> > minutes per one hour criteria.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 7. Arrangements at the Examination
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. Proper sitting arrangement should be made before commencement of 
>>> > the
>>> > examination so as to avoid confusion and distraction.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. Sitting arrangements for the disabled candidates should be made on
>> the
>>> > ground floor, as far as possible.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. Refreshments, if any to scribes/writers should either are served
>> before
>>> > or after the examination and not during the examination.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > d. The Chief invigilator of the examination center should have
>>> discretionary
>>> > powers to accept last minute change of scribes under exigencies.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > e. Considering the fact that many exams are held in overlapping
>> schedules
>>> > and also the fact that the scribes may not be free/willing to commit
>>> > themselves for the entire duration of exam or examination of various
>>> > languages, more than one person may be permitted to write different
>> papers
>>> > for the same examination, provided they fulfill all other conditions
>> laid
>>> > down in clauses 3 or 4 above. For enacting such a change in scribes 
>>> > for
>>> > different papers, the ground of contingency should not be a mandatory
>>> > requirement.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > f. The letter approving the scribe should contain the following
>>> information
>>> > in writing:
>>> >
>>> > i. The extra time given to the candidate
>>> >
>>> > ii. He shall be seated separately
>>> >
>>> > iii. Contact address and phone number of competent authority should
>>> > also
>>> be
>>> > printed for last minute change of scribe.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > g. To minimize the need for last minute change in the scribe and in
>>> > view
>>> of
>>> > (e) above, a collective sanction letter may be issued, sanctioning
>>> multiple
>>> > scribes proposed by the examinee, so that any of them may be called
>>> > upon
>>> to
>>> > act as the scribe in any particular paper, without the hassle of
>>> formalities
>>> > involved in changing the scribe at the eleventh hour.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > h. Candidate, scribe and supervisor should be provided with full
>>> information
>>> > about the duration of the examination.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 8. Aids and appliances
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. a. All Visually Disabled candidates may be allowed to carry special
>>> > mathematical aids such as Taylor's frame or abacus as they have no
>>> > other
>>> way
>>> > of calculating sums.  Neither abacus nor Taylor's frame calculate the
>> sums
>>> > but are mere aids such as a paper for candidates with vision.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. in papers such as accounts the visually disabled candidate may be
>>> allowed
>>> > to carry Braille slates and papers for writing the numbers as it is
>>> > difficult to remember the balance sheets
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. The visually disabled candidate should also be allowed to use
>> optical/
>>> > electronic low vision aids such as magnifying glass;
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 9. Alternative Formats
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > a. In addition to the facility of a scribe the Visually Disabled
>>> candidates
>>> > have the facility to write answers in Braille or on a computer or a
>>> > typewriter or may ask for question paper in large font.
>>> >
>>> > b. The answer paper in Braille should be evaluated by the
>> expert/examiners
>>> > in Braille script. If possible the question paper may be provided in
>>> Braille
>>> > or in digital text.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. The font size of the question paper should not be less than 20 for
>> the
>>> > benefit of low vision candidates.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > d. Considering the developments in technology, all examination
>> conducting
>>> > bodies should facilitate the use of computers for taking the exams by
>> the
>>> > visually Disabled examinees, if the candidate so desires.
>>> >
>>> > e. Visually Disabled candidates appearing for "Open book Exams may be
>>> > provided the texts of such books in Braille, in digital format on the
>>> > computer or in large text at the choice of the candidate.
>>> >
>>> > 10. Alternative Questions
>>> >
>>> > a. Alternative questions must be provided in cases where the original
>>> > question contains visual elements and/or require the candidate to
>>> interpret
>>> > or produce such visual elements. However the candidate may elect to
>> answer
>>> > the original question.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. Wherever possible, the visual graphs should be supplemented by
>>> > descriptive explanation of the graphs for visually Disabled 
>>> > candidates.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. For practical exams the Visually Disabled candidate must be allowed
>> the
>>> > help of a laboratory  assistant to conduct the experiment and or be
>>> provided
>>> > alternative oral questions in place of the experiment to be conducted.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 11. Examination on Computers
>>> >
>>> > a. Visually Disabled candidates can appear in examination on the
>> computer
>>> > only if students are computer literate and can type at least at the
>> speed
>>> of
>>> > 30 words per minute. The software and hardware is now available to 
>>> > make
>>> > students write their examinations both in Hindi and English mediums
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > b. This form of examination is preferable than the use of scribes due
>>> > to
>>> the
>>> > following reasons:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i. High payments being demanded by Scribes
>>> >
>>> > ii. Wasting crucial time just before the examinations just to look for
>>> > scribes.
>>> >
>>> > iii. Sexual harassment of girl students.
>>> >
>>> > iv. Losing marks due to mistakes of scribes or casual attitude of
>> scribes.
>>> >
>>> > v. Week students getting away with good marks by making their scribes
>>> write
>>> > answers to questions that they do not know.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > c. The use of computers for examination does not mean that a scribe to
>>> read
>>> > the question paper is dispensed with. However the candidate may not
>>> require
>>> > a sighted person and dispense with the same.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > d. The responsibility to bring a computer is not on the student/
>>> candidate.
>>> > The centre/ Examining authority shall spare one of its own Computers
>>> > for
>>> the
>>> > exam.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > e. However if it is feasible then the candidate may be allowed to use
>> his
>>> > own computer. This may be decided by the candidate and the examining
>>> > authority mutually.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > f. the only responsibility that a student aspiring to give exam on
>>> computer
>>> > has, is to bring the screen reading software.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > g. The candidate should be allowed to install the screen reading
>> software
>>> a
>>> > day in advance on the computer provided with printer installed
>>> >
>>> > h. recommended Equipment preparation:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i. For each candidate appearing in the examination two computers may 
>>> > be
>>> set
>>> > up for this purpose. One for writing the examination and one as
>>> > stand-by
>>> in
>>> > case of any failure in the machine.
>>> >
>>> > ii. The computer must have the following software installed:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > A.        MS Office
>>> >
>>> > B.         Page maker 6
>>> >
>>> > C.        Jaws for windows screen reading software.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > iii. The medium of examination for the student can be in English or
>> Hindi
>>> .
>>> >
>>> > iv. All the data on the Computer must be password protected using the
>>> > utility software called Folder Access. This software can make any
>>> > folder
>>> > access limited by password.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   6.. UPS with back-up of 2 hours must be installed at the centre.
>>> >   7.. Vi. Two printers may be kept for taking the final print-outs of
>> the
>>> > answer sheets.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i. Recommended procedure for examination:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > i. The computer centre or the library may be designated as one of the
>>> > examination centres for conducting the examination.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ii. Question paper must be sent to this Centre on a CD.
>>> >
>>> > iii. The question paper may be sent in the page-maker file format.
>>> >
>>> > iv. The paper then requires to be converted into a MS word file. The
>>> > original file may be opened in the page maker software. Each page of
>>> > the
>>> > question paper must be copied and pasted in the MS word document.
>>> >
>>> > v. if the candidate is appearing in English Medium,  the Jaws software
>> may
>>> > speak gibberish where Hindi text appears, all Hindi language text must
>> be
>>> > deleted from the question paper.
>>> >
>>> > vi. This MS word file must be password protected.
>>> >
>>> > vii. Answer sheet- One blank MS-word document may be created on the
>>> Computer
>>> > and shortcut to this may be created on the desk-top. This blank
>>> > document
>>> > must have the paper size and margins set according to the extension
>> sheets
>>> > of the answer sheet on which the final print-out will be taken. Viii.
>> The
>>> > role-number and other details of the candidate must be filled on the
>>> > original sheet by the invigilator using normal pen. These extension
>> sheets
>>> > must be stapled with each sheet of the original answer sheet. Each
>>> > sheet
>>> > must be signed by the invigilator.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   8.. The candidate must be allowed to have access to the Computer 10
>>> > minutes before the start of examination time.
>>> >   9.. X. At the time of start of examination, the password for the
>>> question
>>> > paper file must be told to the candidate.
>>> > 12. Other Disabled Candidates
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Although the aforesaid guidelines are specifically for Visually
>>> > disabled
>>> > candidates these guidelines may be used by the Examining authorities
>> while
>>> > conducting examinations for other candidates suffering from disability
>>> > whether permanent or temporary.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > To unsubscribe send a message to 
>>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> with
>>> > the subject unsubscribe.
>>> >
>>> > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>>> please
>>> > visit the list home page at
>>> >
>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>> > To unsubscribe send a message to 
>>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>> >
>>> > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>>> please visit the list home page at
>>> >
>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>>
>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please visit the list home page at
>>>
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please visit the list home page at
>> 
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, 
> please visit the list home page at
>  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
> 


To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to