one more thing I have been told by many persons that supreme court has given its order based on times of india news on 24th December regarding the issue. if yes then how UGC has gone in appeal in Kerala High court? whats this all drama?
On 1/18/13, Shona Man <shonam...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi Syed, after several readings of above notification I couldn't > understand the intention of UGC that what they are going to do? is > this the criteria upon which they have decided the result of NET june > 2012, or they will announce fresh result of NET june 2012 based upon > above criteria? what is this top 7% candidate's matter? unable to get > it? > can anybody explain? > > On 1/17/13, S. M. syed hussain <syed.ci...@gmail.com> wrote: >> New Update >> Qualifying.pdf >> The qualifying criteria for June-2012 “Those candidates who had made >> it to the consideration zone, i.e., those who received a minimum of >> 40%, 40% & 50% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively >> for General Category; 35%, 35% & 45% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and >> Paper-III respectively for OBC (Non-creamy layer) Category and 35%, >> 35% & 40% marks in Paper-I, Paper-II and Paper-III respectively for >> SC/ST/PWD Category and those who secured aggregate percentage >> (obtained by combining marks of Paper-I, II & III) of 65% for `General >> category, 60% for OBC (Non-creamy layer) and 55% for SC/ST/PWD >> category candidates (This is the same criterion as decided by the >> earlier Moderation Committee). OR Those candidates who figure among >> top 7% of all the candidates who appeared in NET; this shall be >> calculated separately for each discipline and for each category >> (SC/ST/OBC(Non Creamy Layer)/PWD). Accordingly a cut-off will be >> determined for each subject and each category for this purpose. In >> case of tie (when several students have same identical aggregate >> marks) all the candidates appearing at the qualifying marks shall be >> included. Candidates who do not secure minimum required score in each >> paper and are therefore not in the consideration zone, will not >> included in this list even if they fall among the top 7% within their >> subject and category.” >> >> >> Source: www.ugcnetonline.ac.in >> Best >> Syed >> >> >> On 1/17/13, VIJAY KUMAR P.V.S. <vijay.palakod...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes it is really good news for me also. Please provide the source. >>> >>> Eagerly waiting for its source. >>> >>> Thank you very much in advance >>> >>> With warm regards >>> >>> VIJAY >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13-01-2013 04:57, Neeraj Singh wrote: >>>> vary good news! could you provide the sorce of this news? Regards. >>>> Neeraj sing mobile 09630305273 skype neeraj2213 >>>> >>>> On 1/12/13, Shona Man <shonam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> good news. though i hurd that the Kerala HC order has been confirmed >>>>> by Supreme Court! All students who have passed three papers >>>>> individually must be awarded the benifit. >>>>> >>>>> On 1/11/13, prasanth P.V. <prasanth.mangala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Yesterday there was a newspaper report in a malayalam daily >>>>>> "mathrubhumi" that the UGC has appealed in the divission bench of >>>>>> Kerala HC against that dicission >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/11/13, Prashanth <prashanthmn1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I too surprised by the news. >>>>>>> The Kerala high court has given 1 month of time to [from 16/12/2012] >>>>>>> issue >>>>>>> certificates and also declared that, the candidates who are having >>>>>>> minimum >>>>>>> eligibility are cleared lectureship. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> From: "SC Vashishth" <subhashvashis...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:26 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AI] UGC Net >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I echo the views by Rajesh. If a High Court has ruled in favour of >>>>>>>> candidates set the things right, all candidates across the nation >>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> relief. The court in this matter has not excluded others from the >>>>>>>> benefit >>>>>>>> by declaring it as a special case. On the contrary, it has held the >>>>>>>> process >>>>>>>> untenable, thus there is no need to file any PIL or individual >>>>>>>> writs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By filing multiple writs in different High Courts, please don't >>>>>>>> invites >>>>>>>> situations for conflicting orders from different courts putting the >>>>>>>> Kerala >>>>>>>> HC decision in peril and making UGC consider moving SC for >>>>>>>> clarifications. >>>>>>>> We are not aware of UGC going against the Kerala HC judgement >>>>>>>> meaning >>>>>>>> thereby that the order has achieved finality. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Another question is how do a person know that there is already an >>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>> from some HC on a matter that affects him. This list serves a >>>>>>>> very important purpose of keeping all of us informed. >>>>>>>> Lets resolve to bring to the notice of all any new development >>>>>>>> happening >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the courts any where in India - be it as PIL or an individual writ >>>>>>>> answering substantial questions of law, interpretation or >>>>>>>> policies >>>>>>>> affecting the persons with disabilities in general. >>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10 January 2013 10:06, Asudani, Rajesh >>>>>>>> <rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am more than surprised at operations of law, though being a >>>>>>>>> lawyer >>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>> training myself. >>>>>>>>> Kerala HC has already ruled that the said notification fixing the >>>>>>>>> cumulative criteria afterwards is bad in law and has given a >>>>>>>>> ruling >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> favor of candidates. >>>>>>>>> So, why must the same case be fought in other states to secure the >>>>>>>>> similar >>>>>>>>> ruling for all candidates? >>>>>>>>> Actually, UGC must have given benefit of the decision to all >>>>>>>>> candidates >>>>>>>>> automatically, or Kerala HC must have directed it to do so. >>>>>>>>> Agreed that Writ petition is filed by an aggrieved individual, >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> a waste of grossest kind to ask each candidate to fight >>>>>>>>> separately, >>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> provision is affecting many persons. >>>>>>>>> PIL would have been a better remedy, perhaps. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: worldopin...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>> [mailto:worldopin...@googlegroups.com] >>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Prashanth >>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:52 PM >>>>>>>>> To: AccessIndia >>>>>>>>> Cc: World Opinion Google's group: >>>>>>>>> Subject: (WorldOpinion) High court's last chance for University >>>>>>>>> Grants >>>>>>>>> Commission to name National Eligibility Test criteria: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vaibhav Ganjapure, TNN Jan 8, 2013, 02.26AM IST >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> NAGPUR: The University Grants Commission (UGC) on Monday came >>>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>>> fire >>>>>>>>> from the Nagpur bench of Mumbai high court for its failure to come >>>>>>>>> clear >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> the issue of fixing eligibility criteria for the National >>>>>>>>> Eligibility >>>>>>>>> Test >>>>>>>>> (NET). A division bench comprising justices AP Lavande and Arun >>>>>>>>> Chaudhari >>>>>>>>> granted two weeks to the apex education body as the final chance >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> decide >>>>>>>>> its policy. The judges further warned that it will proceed with >>>>>>>>> orders, >>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> UGC fails to file a reply within the stipulated period, and asked >>>>>>>>> UGC >>>>>>>>> officials to be present at the next hearing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The court's stringent orders came while hearing a plea filed by >>>>>>>>> Gokulpeth >>>>>>>>> resident Sayalee Surjuse, who has challenged a UGC notification >>>>>>>>> imposing >>>>>>>>> minimum qualifying criteria for NET conducted on June 24 last >>>>>>>>> year. >>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>> test is conducted simultaneously across the country for various >>>>>>>>> subjects >>>>>>>>> for lectureship and junior research fellowship (JRF). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Citing UGC's notification on its website, petitioner's counsel >>>>>>>>> Trupti >>>>>>>>> Udeshi said the candidate had to score 40% in first two pears and >>>>>>>>> 50% >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> the third. She contended that there was no mention of the >>>>>>>>> necessity >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> score above a specified aggregate of all three papers, which will >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> criteria for final qualification. She also said that this criteria >>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>> never communicated till the declaration of the result. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When NET results were declared on September 18, Sayalee was >>>>>>>>> declared >>>>>>>>> failed. It was only after she enquired that she came to know that >>>>>>>>> UGC >>>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>>> fixed 65% aggregate criteria for the qualification. She claimed to >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> scored 59.43% aggregate in all three papers and also cleared them >>>>>>>>> individually. Citing scheme of exam by UGC, she demanded that she >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> declared successful. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> She sought directives from the court to quash the UGC notification >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> June >>>>>>>>> 24 fixing the eligibility criteria NET at 65% aggregate for >>>>>>>>> general >>>>>>>>> category by holding it arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable in >>>>>>>>> law. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The judges pulled up UGC for its lacklustre approach to the plight >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> candidates from Maharashtra, stating that the apex body had not >>>>>>>>> responded >>>>>>>>> properly to a case based on the same grounds in other states. In >>>>>>>>> Kerala, >>>>>>>>> the HC had ruled in favour of candidates by quashing the UGC >>>>>>>>> notification, >>>>>>>>> as the number of candidates were much more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/nagpur/36216041_1_ugc-notification-ugc-officials-three-papers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With thanks and regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (Rajesh Asudani) >>>>>>>>> Assistant General Manager >>>>>>>>> Reserve Bank of India >>>>>>>>> Nagpur >>>>>>>>> Cell: 9420397185 >>>>>>>>> o: +91 712 2806846 >>>>>>>>> R: 2591349 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (In youth you want things, and then in middle-age you want to want >>>>>>>>> them.) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, smses or >>>>>>>>> makes >>>>>>>>> calls >>>>>>>>> asking for personal information like your bank account details, >>>>>>>>> passwords, >>>>>>>>> etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not >>>>>>>>> respond >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>> manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may >>>>>>>>> look. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are >>>>>>>>> confidential >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom >>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any >>>>>>>>> dissemination, >>>>>>>>> use, >>>>>>>>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the information >>>>>>>>> contained >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly >>>>>>>>> prohibited. >>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>> you have received this email by error, please notify us by return >>>>>>>>> e-mail >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>> telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and >>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>> attachments. The recipient should check this email and any >>>>>>>>> attachments >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no >>>>>>>>> liability >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Warm regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Subhash Chandra Vashishth >>>>>>>> Advocate- Delhi High Court >>>>>>>> Mobile: +91 (11) 9811125521 >>>>>>>> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Consider >>>>>>>> environment! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing >>>>>>>> accessibility >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>>>>>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Search for old postings at: >>>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>>>>>>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>>>>>>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other >>>>>>>> changes, >>>>>>>> please visit the list home page at >>>>>>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing >>>>>>> accessibility >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>>>>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Search for old postings at: >>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>>>>>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>>>>>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other >>>>>>> changes, >>>>>>> please >>>>>>> visit the list home page at >>>>>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Prasanth. >>>>>>> True friendship consists not innmultitude of friends, but in their >>>>>>> worth> >>>>>>> and value> >>>>>> >>>>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing >>>>>> accessibility >>>>>> of >>>>>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>>>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Search for old postings at: >>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>>>>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>>>>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>>>>> >>>>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>>>>> please >>>>>> visit the list home page at >>>>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> LL.M candidate >>>>> at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing >>>>> accessibility >>>>> of >>>>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Search for old postings at: >>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>>>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>>>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>>>> >>>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>>>> please >>>>> visit the list home page at >>>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>>> of >>>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>> >>>> >>>> Search for old postings at: >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>>> >>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>>> please visit the list home page at >>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>>> >>> >>> >>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>> of >>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please >>> visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >> of >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> > > > -- > LL.M candidate > at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi > -- LL.M candidate at Faculty of Law in University of Delhi Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
