I couldn't get your second point. How does the person who knows all the simbels and notations, is more or over qualified than you? If one person is pursuing MBA program, cann't he get a scribe who is junior from the same stream who know how to write those particular symbols? In academic exams, my argument is that your scribe should not have passed the same exam at higher level in which you are appearing. Is it too hard? Then tell me how the mentality of the sarkari officers would be changed, who are believing that there are some chances of cheating etc. if candidate's own senior is writing his exam. And no authority is ready to accept those guidelines, so called MSJE guidelines which provide this unreasonable clause.
On 6/19/15, Ajay Minocha <ajayminoc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I have following things to say. > 1. I fully agree with Avinash, Just imposing a bar on qualification > isn't a full- proof solution to crackdown malpractices by the > candidates. > If the incompitant visually impaired people have got jobs in banks by > greesing the palms of their scribes then it's the flaw of system and > other candidates can't be left tu suffer because of them. Here I fully > agree with Harish sir and being a finance student have seen the > practical side of it in this country's one of the most prestigious > business school. > 2. Mohib: It will just make my situation more miserable because the > person who knows all the simbels and notations correctly is over > qualified and the other one which is allowed by the examining body > doesn't know anything. So do you want me to forget about my > preparation and teach him how to read and right that particular > content? > 3. Sanjay: look into the technical part of allowing the candidates to > use screenreaders. > Even if the examining bodies insure that every computer terminal has a > workable copy of NVDA installed then how would you insure that the > system has been tested for all the bugs from a screen reader user's > perspective? > The point I want to make is that usage of screen readers in the exams > can be optional but can't be cumpulsory at any cost. > 4. Harish sir: using CCTV survailance can be an option but usage of > mobile phones and other removable camera devices can be a big concern > for the examining boddies. So those who can't afford a CCTV have to > rely on human beings only. > > P.s: all of it is a personal opinion and I don't intend to hurt > anyone's feelings. > Regards, > Ajay > > On 6/18/15, Misbah <jnu.mis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In the era of digital India, I think only way should be to check >> malpractices in examination is videography. Any other condition like >> lower educational qualifications may again force back to Stone Age. >> This present scribe guideline has done a revolutionary change in terms >> of shifting the blame of malpractice over the system rather than, over >> the most deprived and neglected poor blind candidates. >> Hence the responsibility of those who are right now in the realm of >> the affairs to venture this path very cautiously and open-mindedly. >> >> >> On 6/18/15, sanjay <sanjaylpra...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: >>> Most of the group members including the learned ones are simply >>> legitimising the dependency. Such provisions can create only >>> inefficient >>> and unskilled blind mass. Please remember, it was easy for unskilled >>> people to survive in 19th and 20th century because they did have plenty >>> of >>> works to do. But today, the situation has completely changed. Imagine >>> if >>> such guidelines are implemented in school and college levels. I knew >>> about >>> >>> a school where writers were also prepared for 10th grade exams with >>> blind >>> students before the exams and, in this process, dull students were >>> ensured >>> best writers. That school was interested only in grabbing newspaper >>> headlines by claiming that their blind students did better than all >>> other >>> schools in the state. Rest I leave to your imagination. If such >>> guidelines >>> >>> are backed by some institutes/organisations working for blind who are >>> interested only in taking credit for recruiting blind individuals, then >>> there is no point in arguing about this subject. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >>> of >>> mobile phones / Tabs on: >>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please >>> visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >>> >>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >>> the >>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >>> >>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the >>> mails >>> sent through this mailing list.. >>> >> >> >> -- >> MD MISHBAHUL >> PHD RESEARCH SCHOLAR >> CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES, >> JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY >> DELHI INDIA >> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility >> of >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the >> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the >> mails >> sent through this mailing list.. >> > > > -- > Ajay Minocha > Mob : +91-9584076767 > E mail : ajayminoc...@gmail.com > p13aj...@iimidr.ac.in > Skype: ajayminocha2 > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > -- Mohib Anwar Rafay Phone: +919 555 555 765 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
