Hi Derek,

The requirement roughly is:
Assume a few light switches as multicasters and many luminaires as listeners
- turning lights on / off via multicast
The end-2-end processing (multicaster to encrypt&sign the message, the
network to transmit the message, and the listeners to validate&decrypt the
message) should not exceed ~200 ms.

Stevie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Atkins [mailto:de...@ihtfp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:51 PM
> To: Beck, Stefan <s.b...@osram.com>
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@arm.com>; ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ace] multicast
> 
> Hi,
> 
> "Beck, Stefan" <s.b...@osram.com> writes:
> 
> [snip]
> > even supporting the "low-latency" requirements we need, also
> > considering the
> [snip]
> 
> Could you provide some more concrete numbers for your definition of "low-
> latency" requirements?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -derek
> 
> --
>        Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
>        de...@ihtfp.com
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ihtfp.com&data=0
> 2%7C01%7C%7C015cc4c4b8da4534720808d516f87712%7Cec1ca250c2344d56a
> 76b7dfb9eee0c46%7C0%7C0%7C636440178780250813&sdata=C3WzL%2FAdUd
> wWhHz3aaAg0V4TZgBCWIkYqqH%2FF3tMjDw%3D&reserved=0
>        Computer and Internet Security Consultant

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to