On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:55:46AM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Hi Ludwig, > > > I'm not sure what the RFC editors prefer as affiliation > > (I've seen both): > > > > -- > > E. Wahlstroem > > > > -- OR > > E. Wahlstroem > > (no affiliation) > > — > > I don’t know what the RFC editor prefers her, but I find “no affiliation” > jarring — leaving the space open is much better.
I also sometimes see "Unaffliated". > > === > > 2. Terminology > > > > In the RFC 2119 boilerplate I noticed that only MUST, MUST NOT and NOT > > RECOMMENDED is used in the draft. What is the recommended procedure here? > > It feels like we could remove the other ones. > > It is usual to include the whole boilerplate (obviously the corrected one, > with NOT RECOMMENDED included, in this case). Right, at this point people should be citing BCP 14/RFC 8174. -Ben _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
