On Feb 20, 2019, at 22:33, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) <pkamp...@cisco.com> wrote: > > If we broke the requests to different URIs, it means that a client needs to > keep track of his transactions and on top of it he needs to correlate the key > and the cert he receives at a later time.
I think this is just a misunderstanding — the idea wasn’t to supply the parts under different URIs, but to make up different URIs for retrieving the different combinations coming in one multipart-core, in one transaction. As in /skg?sk=284&spk=281 (Where sk is short for “secret key” and spk for “signed public key” — substitute your own names.) or, say /skg/284,281 This provides full format agility while preserving the interaction model. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
