Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
> I think this is just a misunderstanding — the idea wasn’t to supply the
> parts under different URIs, but to make up different URIs for
> retrieving the different combinations coming in one multipart-core, in
> one transaction.
> or, say
> /skg/284,281
> This provides full format agility while preserving the interaction model.
I sure prefer this over other hacks.
Would the client say Accept: 62 to indicate it's willingness to receive a
multipart?
It seems that multiple Accept: option headers may be allowed.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
