Peter, Why not document what you invent in a draft? To me it would be a good starting point.
/Ludwig From: Peter van der Stok <stokc...@bbhmail.nl> Sent: den 4 maj 2020 09:15 To: Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> Cc: Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.se...@combitech.se>; Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>; peter van der Stok <consulta...@vanderstok.org>; Ace <ace@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz Hi Carsten, The imagination will not have finished its work in 10 yeras time if coap and the authorization will enjoy the success they merit. Also I don't see anybody being ready to start such a document the coming month. Do you see another document in which a first set of these registrations can be added? FYI, today I do my iplementation and (to my regret) will invent something of my own. cheerio, Peter Carsten Bormann schreef op 2020-05-04 08:51: On 2020-05-04, at 08:42, Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.se...@combitech.se<mailto:ludwig.se...@combitech.se>> wrote: For the sake of getting the document finished before I die of old age ;-) would it be possible to specify this in a separate document? I think there may be multiple of these RT registrations, because the fact that a resource is part of an AS is only part of the information that is needed: The RT could tell us more about the way the AS wants to be used. I think that is a strong argument to *not* do these RT registrations in the framework, because we will not have enough imagination to catch them all. So my recommendation would indeed be a separate document. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org<mailto:Ace@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
