On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:33:48PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > > The two last ones are editorial, but the first about enumerating all BR > > methods isn't (since it needs new validation method identifiers). > > Thinking about it a bit more, I don't think it is appropriate for > ACME to list CABF things. That's a strong view as an individual, > and a moderate view as a WG chair.
Yeah, the major problem includes keeping the list up to date if a new method comes about. Or if some method is modified in major way. -Ilari _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
