Thanks for clarifying. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
> > - No, because GET+capability > GET. If you're going to have GET at > all, you should have GET+capability > > > > And more importantly, you do not HAVE to do it; the text just has pointers > on how to do it if desired. >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
