RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC

[Gil Kirkpatrick]

Title: Message

I haven't tested it myself, but I doubt very much. Assuming the programmers used reasonable data structures internally, the calculation should be pretty straightforward. Of all the things a DC does during authentication, I suspect that site determination is one of the quickest. -----Original Message----- From: Garello, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC How much overhead does leaving it up to the locator incur?   Ken   -----Original Message----- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:37 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC   Hey Don,   Is this your first post to the list? If so, welcome.   To answer your question, no you don't have to create a site for each subnet. You can associate multiple subnets with a single site. Or you can leave the subnets unassigned, and the DC locator will do its best to find a DC "close" to the authenticating PC.   -gil -----Original Message----- From: Don Murawski (Lenox) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC We have subnets without dc's, do you need to create a site and subnet in Sites and Services anyway for those sites?   Don L Murawski