You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server 
software would support it.

We do Radius  with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely.


=======================================
Arron S. King
Network & Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
v: 614.251.4515
f:  614.252.2650



-----Original Message-----
From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?


Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box
with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC  to get
permissions, etc?  I wanted to try to mess around with this..

Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003


We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment.

There are many enhancements that have made our life easier.

Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many
African countries and with this we have the issue of bad
telecommunications to our foreign branches.

We are using the feature called "Replicate from Media".
All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore
to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the
Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory
replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it
will receive the updates which will be minimal.

Other features include:
DNS Stub Zones
Conditional Forwarding 
Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or
certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can
be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on
previously but will continue with a cache
profile)
DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. 
Domain Rename: also need .NET Native
(Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your
servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive
trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool
considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one
domain to the required one.

One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous
versions.

Hope this info helps you.
These are from the top of my head.

Need anything else let me know.

Yusuf


-----Original Message-----
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003

yes

-----Original Message-----
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003


Is windows 2003 Windows .NET??????

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM
To:     '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:        RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003

I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in
WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements
in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation),
replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for
certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A
nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no
access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the
overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed
that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as
well.

Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is
fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment
of WS2K3 when it ships.

-gil


-----Original Message-----
From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003


Hello Everyone!

With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of
Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the
Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to be released
in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this version and
found it much better than Windows2000 version? 


Thanks in advance your advice and input!

Cliff Airhart 
Answer Financial Inc. 
Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

______________________________________________

Disclaimer and confidentiality note


Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official
business of 
Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is
confidential, legally 
privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse
any other content. 
Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as
being that of Standard Bank. 

The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient.
Please notify the sender 
immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read,
disclose or use the content in any way. 

Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication
has been maintained nor 
that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.

______________________________________________
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to