You seriously need some anger management classes. And lessons on using appropriate language.
And you may want to see about getting that caps lock key unstuck. ---- Original Message ---- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:53:25 -0800 >KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..........HOW >MANY >TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron >S. >Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? > > >You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your >dialin >server software would support it. > >We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. > > >======================================= >Arron S. King >Network & Systems Administrator >Ohio Dominican University > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >v: 614.251.4515 >f: 614.252.2650 > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? > > >Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box >with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to >get >permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. > >Thanks. >-----Original Message----- >From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > >We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. > >There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. > >Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many >African countries and with this we have the issue of bad >telecommunications to our foreign branches. > >We are using the feature called "Replicate from Media". >All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then >restore >to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the >Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory >replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up >it >will receive the updates which will be minimal. > >Other features include: >DNS Stub Zones >Conditional Forwarding >Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all >domains or >certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests >can >be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged >on >previously but will continue with a cache >profile) >DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. >Domain Rename: also need .NET Native >(Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot >your >servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: >Transitive >trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool >considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one >domain to the required one. > >One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the >previous >versions. > >Hope this info helps you. >These are from the top of my head. > >Need anything else let me know. > >Yusuf > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > >yes > >-----Original Message----- >From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > >Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?????? > > -----Original Message----- >From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > >I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD >in >WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable >improvements >in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), >replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for >certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A >nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no >access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the >overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed >that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as >well. > >Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade >path is >fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting >deployment >of WS2K3 when it ships. > >-gil > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > >Hello Everyone! > >With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of >Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the >Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to be >released >in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this version >and >found it much better than Windows2000 version? > > >Thanks in advance your advice and input! > >Cliff Airhart >Answer Financial Inc. >Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness >[EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you. >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > >______________________________________________ > >Disclaimer and confidentiality note > > >Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the >official >business of >Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is >confidential, legally >privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and >endorse >any other content. >Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as >being that of Standard Bank. > >The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. >Please notify the sender >immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, >disclose or use the content in any way. > >Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication >has been maintained nor >that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > >______________________________________________ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > >List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm >List archive: >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
