It is annoying and I think he got his message across......sometimes CAPS
LOCKS are completely necessary


-----Original Message-----
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?


You seriously need some anger management classes.  And lessons on using
appropriate language.  

And you may want to see about getting that caps lock key unstuck.

---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:53:25 -0800

>KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..........HOW
>MANY
>TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron
>S.
>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
>
>
>You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your
>dialin
>server software would support it.
>
>We do Radius  with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely.
>
>
>=======================================
>Arron S. King
>Network & Systems Administrator
>Ohio Dominican University
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>v: 614.251.4515
>f:  614.252.2650
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
>
>
>Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box 
>with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC  to get
>permissions, etc?  I wanted to try to mess around with this..
>
>Thanks.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003
>
>
>We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment.
>
>There are many enhancements that have made our life easier.
>
>Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many 
>African countries and with this we have the issue of bad 
>telecommunications to our foreign branches.
>
>We are using the feature called "Replicate from Media".
>All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then
>restore
>to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the
>Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory
>replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up 
>it
>will receive the updates which will be minimal.
>
>Other features include:
>DNS Stub Zones
>Conditional Forwarding
>Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all 
>domains or
>certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests 
>can
>be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged 
>on
>previously but will continue with a cache
>profile)
>DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. 
>Domain Rename: also need .NET Native
>(Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot 
>your
>servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: 
>Transitive
>trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool
>considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one
>domain to the required one.
>
>One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the
>previous
>versions.
>
>Hope this info helps you.
>These are from the top of my head.
>
>Need anything else let me know.
>
>Yusuf
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003
>
>yes
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003
>
>
>Is windows 2003 Windows .NET??????
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From:  Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent:  Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM
>To:    '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject:       RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003
>
>I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD
>in
>WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable 
>improvements
>in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation),
>replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for
>certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A
>nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no
>access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the
>overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed
>that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as
>well.
>
>Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade
>path is
>fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting 
>deployment
>of WS2K3 when it ships.
>
>-gil
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003
>
>
>Hello Everyone!
>
>With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of 
>Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the 
>Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to be released
>in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this version 
>and
>found it much better than Windows2000 version? 
>
>
>Thanks in advance your advice and input!
>
>Cliff Airhart
>Answer Financial Inc. 
>Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you.
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
>______________________________________________
>
>Disclaimer and confidentiality note
>
>
>Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the
>official
>business of 
>Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is
>confidential, legally 
>privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and 
>endorse
>any other content. 
>Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as
>being that of Standard Bank. 
>
>The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. 
>Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached 
>you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way.
>
>Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication 
>has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception 
>or interference.
>
>______________________________________________
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive: 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive: 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive: 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
>List archive:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to