That is correct, for the Enterprise version. Its roughly $25,000 per processor. Interesting, that seems to be the per processor cost of most of the MS Enterprise apps.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Wilkinson, Stephen (DrKW) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:18 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Single sign-on > > > Just a fyi - On a MS sponsored Windows Server 2003 Readiness > course last week our guys were told that MMS 3.0 would cost > £25,000 (may have been $s) per processor. Which is a > stunning amount of money - in either currency > > > Stephen Wilkinson > > Tel: +44(0)207 4759276 > Mobile: +44(0)7973 143970 > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 June 2003 21:14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Typically, there are very expensive packages that a difficult > to maintain which set up a wrapper around each application to > handle authentication. Some of these actually reduce security. > > If you want to build a single sign on solution you have to > get pretty deep into delegation and kerberos realms. It > completely depends on the applications and their methods of > authentication and authorization. > > -------------------------- > Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ActiveDir-owner > Sent: 06/05/2003 01:29 PM > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Single sign-on > > And is it good for single sign-on implementations for apps > having disparate databases, Oracle, SQL Server et al ? Any > used-it-and-this-is-what-we-ran-into kind of stories, anyone ? > > ./Shshank > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:30 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Single sign-on > > > Best low cost alternative is called Simple Sync from CPS > Systems. It also doesn't come with the Microsoft only > limitations of the free version of MMS2003 > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Flesher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:26 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Single sign-on > > > > > > Are there any other products out there similar to MMS? When you say > > "clunky to set up and configure", are we talking months? > > > > Chris Flesher > > The University of Chicago > > NSIT/DCS > > 1-773-834-8477 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Glenn Corbett > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:10 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Single sign-on > > > > > > RE: [ActiveDir] Single sign-onThat used to be the case, not sure if > > MMS 2003 has the same sort of requirements. > > > > The main reason they had consulting attached was that MMS > was fairly > > clunky to set up and configure, and unless you knew what you were > > doing, could tie youself up in knots fairly quickly. Obviously not > > something MS wanted to let "into the wild", as customers who had > > problems with it invariably came away with a bad impression > (through > > their lack of knowledge of the product). > > > > ..and it wasnt just MCS, any of the major "certified" > partners could > > assist you with MMS design / implmentation / deployment (did some > > consulting on MMS while @ Compaq/HP). > > > > Glenn > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Mayet, Yusuf Y > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:40 PM > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Single sign-on > > > > > > Rick, correct me if I am wrong but as far as I know if one is > > considering MMS Enterprise than you are bound by MCS to > assist you in > > the Q&A and Design. (and they don't come cheap) Yusuf > > > > <snip> > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > > > List info : > > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail > disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to > http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
