My preference has always been to lock the pagefile to a specific size, for
the exact reasons you mention - page file expansion is an expensive
proposition, and its only going to happen when the system is already
experiencing an above average load.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Mar-Elia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Pagefile sizes... Its that time of 
> year again.
> 
> 
> I think the standard formulas work well as a starting point, 
> but over the years I've gotten stingy on pagefile size, since 
> you can get defragmentation in the pagefile and really big 
> ones can get correspondingly more fragmented if they start to 
> get up to a fair percentage of total disk space. In any case, 
> my overall goal is to prevent the OS from having to grow the 
> pagefile as the memory pressure increases, since growing the 
> page file is a pretty expensive operation, especially if the 
> disk is already fragmented. So what I try to do is keep an 
> eye on the system's total Committed Bytes during the server's 
> typical workload cycle. You can see peak committed bytes in 
> Task Manager (under Commit Charge) or in PerfMon (under the 
> Memory object). I'm sure there's a technical reason behind 
> it, but Windows seems to grow the pagefile when the Committed 
> Bytes allocated by the system gets near the Commit Limit. The 
> commit limit is roughly the amount of physical MB of RAM you 
> have on the system + the current minimum page file size. So, 
> if you have 500MB of Ram and a 1.5 GB minimum page file size, 
> then your commit limit is 2GB. If the committed bytes peak 
> never even gets close to 2GB over the course of the server 
> doing its job, then you can safely drop the minimum page file 
> size accordingly. You of course want to allow for some buffer 
> for workload increases, but that approach seems to work 
> pretty well and can keep the page file nice and tidy. I'd be 
> interested to hear if anyone finds something different, but 
> this has worked pretty well for me. 
> 
> Darren
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Costanzo, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Pagefile sizes... Its that time of 
> year again.
> 
> 
> The rule of thumb I've always heard is RAM×1.5, so 1.5 GB.
> 
> Ray at work
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> > 
> > So you have a Gig of ram on a DC, what do you all set the
> > pagefile size to?
> > Memory +11 MB?  
> > 
> > Like to hear your feedback.
> 
> 
> **************************************************************
> ********************************************
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended 
> only for the personal and confidential use of the 
> recipient(s) named above.  Distribution, publication, or 
> retransmission of this message is strictly 
> prohibited.  This message may be a bank to client 
> communication and as such is priviliged and confidential.  
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient 
> or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have 
> received this document in error and that any 
> review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
> message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
> this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> e-mail, and delete the original message.
> 
> The sender of this e-mail specifically "opts-out" of the 
> Electronic Signatures and Global and National 
> Commerce Act (E-Sign) and any and all similar state and 
> federal acts.  Accordingly, but without limitation, 
> any and all documents, contracts, and ageements must contain 
> a handwritten signature of the sender to be legal, valid, and 
> enforceable.
> **************************************************************
> ********************************************
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to