Rod,
 
With all due respect, did I somehow indicate otherwise?  If I miscommunicated the message, I'd appreciate guidance on how to better answer a question of this type.
 
-rtk


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

SP4 DOES NOT reintroduce the vulnerability.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question

Given that Russ Cooper did the original study that presented the incomplete / incorrect information that Brian Livingston reported on, going back to Russ is likely the correct step.  Russ has since retracted and corrected his findings.  This correction can be found, as wll on NTBUGTRAQ or the TruSecure site.
 
Regardless - SP4 does NOT negate / remove MS03-026, but please check with NTBUGTRAQ to be 100% certain.  Or, better yet - do as I did when confronted with this.  Conduct your own study!  :-)
 

Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4 question


I have heard mixed opinions on whether or not installing Win2k SP4 breaks the MS03-026 patch. Does anyone have any links to docs form MS about this subject. NTBUGTRAQ posted  some reports from people that SP4 did break the patch, but later found it to be untrue.

Thanks
Jon Hicks | KEMET Electronics Corporation | Server Team
Phone: 864-228-4473
| E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AOL IM: jhicks352
[
Mailing: 2835 KEMET Way  Simpsonville, SC 29681 USA ]


Reply via email to