Well..
I think we should get used to it. We should always keep at least 1
stable branch.
On 11/15/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
> for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
> has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
>
> We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version.
> Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will
> figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also
> run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look
> into that until we actually jump to Java 5.
>
> So what do you say? Shall we switch ??
Maybe this message should be CC'd to the activemq-user list to see how
users feel about such a change. Keeping a 4.1.x branch alive might
wind up being a lot of work WRT backporting fixes to the trunk.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
