How about for creation of META-INF/services files for FactoryFinder?
On 11/15/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It'd be good to use annotations for the xbean stuff On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/15/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good. > > Do you plan to refactor some code to use generics, or other > > Java 5 features ? > > At a minimum we should switch to the Java 1.5 concurrent package. > Switch generics has an upside that it will make our code more type > safe but a downside that merging patches from 4.2.x <-> 4.1.x will be > more difficult. > > How about annotations?? any places where you think those would make more sense? > > > > > On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement > > > for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5 > > > has a much better set of concurrent implementation. > > > > > > We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version. > > > Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will > > > figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also > > > run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look > > > into that until we actually jump to Java 5. > > > > > > So what do you say? Shall we switch ?? > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Hiram > > > > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
