It'd be good to use annotations for the xbean stuff
On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/15/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good.
> Do you plan to refactor some code to use generics, or other
> Java 5 features ?
At a minimum we should switch to the Java 1.5 concurrent package.
Switch generics has an upside that it will make our code more type
safe but a downside that merging patches from 4.2.x <-> 4.1.x will be
more difficult.
How about annotations?? any places where you think those would make more sense?
>
> On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
> > for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
> > has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
> >
> > We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version.
> > Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will
> > figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also
> > run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look
> > into that until we actually jump to Java 5.
> >
> > So what do you say? Shall we switch ??
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
