I see, well the weird combination that i thought is for newer apps. For older apps, you can use that passenger with REE. For newer ones, it's way better to use unicorn. People can isolate each app with RVM with it's own ruby and gem stack. I know that passenger its easier than installing a web browser, maybe there's too many people using it?
I have never used passenger standalone. I think is never needed, since in each app you can have an .htaccess to point another ruby environment. That htaccess must have this: SetEnv GEM_HOME /home/xxxxx/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2011.03@313 ## point this to your own REE or whatever ruby you're using PassengerEnabled On PassengerAppRoot /home/xxxxx/myapp RailsEnv production For those who don't depend on passenger, the best combination (very well explained by github guys) is: nginx on front (apache2 works too, but nginx is a lot faster since can use unix sockets) unicorn running the app. The config is not hard: install nginx as normal, unicorn as gem, config unicorn and nginx (there are a lot of gists with this for a copy/paste). The only thing you have to worry and check is to add an init script to restart the unicorns in case of server reboot. I have gist with this also. There are lots of howto on internet for this. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sergio Cambra <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > I don't think is so weird combination, if you have some old apps running > REE in the same server is easier to run REE than setup passenger-standalone > to run 1.9, also I think you don't have dynamic processes with > passenger-standalone. But upcoming passenger 4 will allow to setup ruby > version per virtualhost. > > > > On Lunes, 14 de enero de 2013 13:36:36 Hernan Astudillo escribió: > > Besides, the upcoming rails 4 (which is the following to 3.2, there won't > be a 3.3) will only support ruby 1.9.3+ > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yea time to upgrade for sure :) > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I can do that, but i don't have any REE 1.8.7 app which i can test it > > against, so if you could test it, i'll branch it. > > > > IMHO Rails 3.2 and REE it's a weird combination... if you're in REE > because > > of passenger, you can still use ruby1.9 with passenger. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Mmmmm. > >> > >> I guess I'll do that in a fork or something. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Ok, the problem is that Enumerator is a ruby 1.9 class. In REE > there's a > >> > Enumerable:Enumerator. > >> > In 1.9 there's also binded as a module, so it could work by changing > >> > Enumerator.each to Enumerable::Enumerator.each > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> The error message is > >> >> > >> >> uninitialized constant ActiveScaffold::Actions::Export::Enumerator > >> >> > >> >> Gist for the stack trace https://gist.github.com/4505964 > >> >> > >> >> REE 1.8.7 Rails 3.2.11 > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >> Groups > >> >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> [email protected]. > >> >> For more options, visit this group at > >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
