i'm working on it. tell you about it later.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you get a chance to look at this again? > > The upgrade to 1.9 is scheduled but won't happen for at least two more > weeks :( > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK I did as instructed, upgraded the gem and tried an export. It > > didn't throw an error message but it also didn't work. The export > > looked like this > > > > #<Proc:0x0000000006b2fe70@ > /home/bingatron/chrysler/staging/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/bundler/gems/active_scaffold_export-94213b2eda02/lib/active_scaffold/actions/export.rb:59> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Tim, > >> > >> I created a branch for REE, since the streaming way isn't good with REE > ( > >> http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.8.7/Enumerable/Enumerator.html) > >> > >> can you try it now? Put this in your Gemfile > >> > >> gem 'active_scaffold_export', :git => > >> 'git://github.com/naaano/active_scaffold_export.git', :branch => 'ree' > >> > >> and bundle update active_scaffold_export > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I see, well the weird combination that i thought is for newer apps. > >>> For older apps, you can use that passenger with REE. For newer ones, > it's > >>> way better to use unicorn. People can isolate each app with RVM with > it's > >>> own ruby and gem stack. > >>> I know that passenger its easier than installing a web browser, maybe > >>> there's too many people using it? > >>> > >>> I have never used passenger standalone. I think is never needed, since > in > >>> each app you can have an .htaccess to point another ruby environment. > >>> That htaccess must have this: > >>> > >>> SetEnv GEM_HOME /home/xxxxx/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2011.03@313 ## point > >>> this to your own REE or whatever ruby you're using > >>> PassengerEnabled On > >>> PassengerAppRoot /home/xxxxx/myapp > >>> RailsEnv production > >>> > >>> > >>> For those who don't depend on passenger, the best combination (very > well > >>> explained by github guys) is: > >>> > >>> nginx on front (apache2 works too, but nginx is a lot faster since can > use > >>> unix sockets) > >>> unicorn running the app. > >>> > >>> The config is not hard: install nginx as normal, unicorn as gem, config > >>> unicorn and nginx (there are a lot of gists with this for a > copy/paste). The > >>> only thing you have to worry and check is to add an init script to > restart > >>> the unicorns in case of server reboot. I have gist with this also. > >>> There are lots of howto on internet for this. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sergio Cambra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I don't think is so weird combination, if you have some old apps > running > >>>> REE in the same server is easier to run REE than setup > passenger-standalone > >>>> to run 1.9, also I think you don't have dynamic processes with > >>>> passenger-standalone. But upcoming passenger 4 will allow to setup > ruby > >>>> version per virtualhost. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Lunes, 14 de enero de 2013 13:36:36 Hernan Astudillo escribió: > >>>> > >>>> Besides, the upcoming rails 4 (which is the following to 3.2, there > won't > >>>> be a 3.3) will only support ruby 1.9.3+ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Yea time to upgrade for sure :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > I can do that, but i don't have any REE 1.8.7 app which i can test > it > >>>> > against, so if you could test it, i'll branch it. > >>>> > > >>>> > IMHO Rails 3.2 and REE it's a weird combination... if you're in REE > >>>> > because > >>>> > of passenger, you can still use ruby1.9 with passenger. > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Mmmmm. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I guess I'll do that in a fork or something. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Hernan Astudillo < > [email protected]> > >>>> >> wrote: > >>>> >> > Ok, the problem is that Enumerator is a ruby 1.9 class. In REE > >>>> >> > there's a > >>>> >> > Enumerable:Enumerator. > >>>> >> > In 1.9 there's also binded as a module, so it could work by > changing > >>>> >> > Enumerator.each to Enumerable::Enumerator.each > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> > >>>> >> > wrote: > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> The error message is > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> uninitialized constant > ActiveScaffold::Actions::Export::Enumerator > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> Gist for the stack trace https://gist.github.com/4505964 > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> REE 1.8.7 Rails 3.2.11 > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> -- > >>>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > >>>> >> >> Groups > >>>> >> >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >>>> >> >> To post to this group, send email to > >>>> >> >> [email protected]. > >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> >> >> [email protected]. > >>>> >> >> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > -- > >>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > >>>> >> > Groups > >>>> >> > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >>>> >> > To post to this group, send email to > >>>> >> > [email protected]. > >>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> >> > [email protected]. > >>>> >> > For more options, visit this group at > >>>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> >> Groups > >>>> >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >>>> >> To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > >>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> >> [email protected]. > >>>> >> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> > Groups > >>>> > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >>>> > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> > [email protected]. > >>>> > For more options, visit this group at > >>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> [email protected]. > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> [email protected]. > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
