OK I did as instructed, upgraded the gem and tried an export. It didn't throw an error message but it also didn't work. The export looked like this
#<Proc:0x0000000006b2fe70@/home/bingatron/chrysler/staging/shared/bundle/ruby/1.8/bundler/gems/active_scaffold_export-94213b2eda02/lib/active_scaffold/actions/export.rb:59> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> wrote: > Tim, > > I created a branch for REE, since the streaming way isn't good with REE ( > http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.8.7/Enumerable/Enumerator.html) > > can you try it now? Put this in your Gemfile > > gem 'active_scaffold_export', :git => > 'git://github.com/naaano/active_scaffold_export.git', :branch => 'ree' > > and bundle update active_scaffold_export > > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I see, well the weird combination that i thought is for newer apps. >> For older apps, you can use that passenger with REE. For newer ones, it's >> way better to use unicorn. People can isolate each app with RVM with it's >> own ruby and gem stack. >> I know that passenger its easier than installing a web browser, maybe >> there's too many people using it? >> >> I have never used passenger standalone. I think is never needed, since in >> each app you can have an .htaccess to point another ruby environment. >> That htaccess must have this: >> >> SetEnv GEM_HOME /home/xxxxx/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2011.03@313 ## point >> this to your own REE or whatever ruby you're using >> PassengerEnabled On >> PassengerAppRoot /home/xxxxx/myapp >> RailsEnv production >> >> >> For those who don't depend on passenger, the best combination (very well >> explained by github guys) is: >> >> nginx on front (apache2 works too, but nginx is a lot faster since can use >> unix sockets) >> unicorn running the app. >> >> The config is not hard: install nginx as normal, unicorn as gem, config >> unicorn and nginx (there are a lot of gists with this for a copy/paste). The >> only thing you have to worry and check is to add an init script to restart >> the unicorns in case of server reboot. I have gist with this also. >> There are lots of howto on internet for this. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sergio Cambra <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think is so weird combination, if you have some old apps running >>> REE in the same server is easier to run REE than setup passenger-standalone >>> to run 1.9, also I think you don't have dynamic processes with >>> passenger-standalone. But upcoming passenger 4 will allow to setup ruby >>> version per virtualhost. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Lunes, 14 de enero de 2013 13:36:36 Hernan Astudillo escribió: >>> >>> Besides, the upcoming rails 4 (which is the following to 3.2, there won't >>> be a 3.3) will only support ruby 1.9.3+ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yea time to upgrade for sure :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > I can do that, but i don't have any REE 1.8.7 app which i can test it >>> > against, so if you could test it, i'll branch it. >>> > >>> > IMHO Rails 3.2 and REE it's a weird combination... if you're in REE >>> > because >>> > of passenger, you can still use ruby1.9 with passenger. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Mmmmm. >>> >> >>> >> I guess I'll do that in a fork or something. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Hernan Astudillo <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > Ok, the problem is that Enumerator is a ruby 1.9 class. In REE >>> >> > there's a >>> >> > Enumerable:Enumerator. >>> >> > In 1.9 there's also binded as a module, so it could work by changing >>> >> > Enumerator.each to Enumerable::Enumerator.each >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Tim Uckun <[email protected]> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> The error message is >>> >> >> >>> >> >> uninitialized constant ActiveScaffold::Actions::Export::Enumerator >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Gist for the stack trace https://gist.github.com/4505964 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> REE 1.8.7 Rails 3.2.11 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> >> Groups >>> >> >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> >> >> To post to this group, send email to >>> >> >> [email protected]. >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> >> [email protected]. >>> >> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> > Groups >>> >> > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> >> > To post to this group, send email to >>> >> > [email protected]. >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> > [email protected]. >>> >> > For more options, visit this group at >>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> Groups >>> >> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> [email protected]. >>> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> > Groups >>> > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > [email protected]. >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.
