On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 20:59, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > it can now be done for 2015-01. So if, next week, the community > decides that all allocations > /22 should never have been made, I > lose the ones I have already? Because it was already done for
This is borderline to bad faith. Policy only affect future, and this is also valid for 2015-01. If you made some assumptions in the past and were not yet able to benefit from what you supposed - bad luck/hurry up (2015-01 is not YET policy). If we manage to change some of the *transfer* conditions, it is because the community belives that there's a problem to be solved. Want to see some really retroactive stuff still not considered so ? Spend a few years here in France :)
