Hi all! I don't understand true reasons of this proposal creation.
Let's think together. If it was created to interrupt exhaustion of IPv4 blocks, I want retort: today, 11.05.2015 have been allocated 6392 IPv4 from last /8 (last block is 185.99.220.0/22, 256/4=64, 64*99=6336, 6336+224/4=6392) If we go here https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/ipv4-transfers/table-of-transfers press ctrl+F and input 185. we can see 508 results, but we should devide it by 2, due to there are 2 results in one transfer. So there are 254 transfers of IPv4 from the last /8. It is 4% from all allocated IPv4 /8. Also you should draw your attention to some LIRs who make more than 10 transfers every day. Yes, they don't transfer IPs from last /8. But did you think how many resources RIPE can fill if it returns unused resources? May be we will think globaly but don't about how to close a hole doesn't affect IPv4 exhaustion. So I oppose this proposal. 2015-05-11 22:44 GMT+03:00, Sascha Luck [ml] <[email protected]>: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:32:19PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote: >>This is borderline to bad faith. > > ISTR you not being very happy about being accused on this list, > so I would thank you very much, indeed, not to accuse me of > acting in bad faith. > > Yours sincerely, > Sascha Luck > > -- ----- Kind regards, Sergey Stecenko
