Exuse me about two same emails. It was bag in my client 2015-05-11 23:22 GMT+03:00, Sergey Stecenko <[email protected]>: > Hi all! > > I don't understand true reasons of this proposal creation. > > Let's think together. If it was created to interrupt exhaustion of > IPv4 blocks, I want retort: > today, 11.05.2015 have been allocated 6392 IPv4 from last /8 > (last block is 185.99.220.0/22, 256/4=64, 64*99=6336, 6336+224/4=6392) > > If we go here > https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/ipv4-transfers/table-of-transfers > press ctrl+F and input 185. we can see 508 results, but we should > devide it by 2, due to there are 2 results in one transfer. So there > are 254 transfers of IPv4 from the last /8. It is 4% from all > allocated IPv4 /8. > > Also you should draw your attention to some LIRs who make more than 10 > transfers every day. Yes, they don't transfer IPs from last /8. But > did you think how many resources RIPE can fill if it returns unused > resources? May be we will think globaly but don't about how to close a > hole doesn't affect IPv4 exhaustion. > > So I oppose this proposal. > > 2015-05-11 22:44 GMT+03:00, Sascha Luck [ml] <[email protected]>: >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:32:19PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote: >>>This is borderline to bad faith. >> >> ISTR you not being very happy about being accused on this list, >> so I would thank you very much, indeed, not to accuse me of >> acting in bad faith. >> >> Yours sincerely, >> Sascha Luck >> >> > > > -- > ----- > Kind regards, > Sergey Stecenko >
-- ----- Kind regards, Sergey Stecenko
