If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 you can read next:
To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent months. Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%? You also could review the period when the part of transfers was the same as the part of allocated blocks and write that the part of transfers from /8 is 100% 01.07.2015, 11:04, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:46:07AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: >> If this proposal closes multi LIR accounts hole, I will support it. But I >> can't do it now. > > The argument "this proposal does not go far enough and loopholes remain > in other areas" has been heard and is considered addressed. > > If you want a change that addresses people opening multiple LIRs, please > bring up a policy proposal to that extent. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- Kind regards, Petr Umelov
