I already wrote about such "trend". Why did you consider such "trend" as season rising or something else?
So I consider "10%" just to make "necessary picture" and this number is not representative. P.S. You can block anybody in this list if you don't like the true. I think it's completely clear to all people what is happening here. 01.07.2015, 11:34, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:19:51AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: >> If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 >> you can read next: >> >> To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s >> from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 >> allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal >> tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent >> months. >> >> Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is >> allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%? > > Because, as has been demonstrated to you, this trend has a clear upward > curve - and the absolute numbers do not really matter if specific behaviour > is seen that the community does not want. > > Your attempt to argue with the small numbers seen so far has been made > in the review phase, and didn't have the desired effect then. So, it is > not a *new* argument. > > So, please stop now, or you WILL be moderated. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
