Hi, On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:19:51AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: > If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 > you can read next: > > To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s > from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 > allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal > tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent > months. > > Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is > allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%?
Because, as has been demonstrated to you, this trend has a clear upward
curve - and the absolute numbers do not really matter if specific behaviour
is seen that the community does not want.
Your attempt to argue with the small numbers seen so far has been made
in the review phase, and didn't have the desired effect then. So, it is
not a *new* argument.
So, please stop now, or you WILL be moderated.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpdZxCb4zlv6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
