On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:16, [email protected] wrote: > Sounds not bad idea, if current pool last us more than 5 years...but on > the other hand, If it will shorten the lasting period below 5, I would > not support it.
5 years seems borderline even with existing policy. Then, in about 3 years APNIC and LACNIC would have probbaly run out dry (ARIN already did) and spill-over to RIPE area could be expected. Just look at the existing us.* LIRs having only 185 v4 address-space. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
