On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 16:37, Sakun Alexey wrote: > Hi! > > I also support removing such limitation based on the reached size. I > think its not fair. > If LIR has /19 - does this mean he dont need more ip addresses? I think > no.
Hi, This is one of the reasons we didn't put that criteria in the initial version. On the other hand, with proper clean-up (which I realise is not something done regularily by most companies - LIR or not), a LIR having a /19 could recover more "no-loger-used" space than a LIR having only a /22 or a /21, and way less that a LIR having a /10 (which may under some circumstance recover the equivalent of a full /22 just by performing clean-up). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
