+1 to this policy On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Carsten Schiefner <[email protected] > wrote:
> Adrian, > > from my PoV we could start to debate you argument: > > On 15.04.2016 11:02, Adrian Pitulac wrote: > > [...] > > > > The discussion regarding the last /8 policy benefit can be long, but > > from statistics and from my point of view, ARIN depletion of pools, > > resulted directly in IPV6 growth. Everyone talks about why RIPE IPv6 > > hasn't exploded. I think the reason is IPv4 pools still available. If > > market will be constrained by lack of IPv4 pools then IPv6 will explode. > > if there aren't *ANY* 2nd market IPv4 brokers operating in the ARIN > region *AT ALL*. > > Which AFAIK is not the case. > > So fulfilling IPv4 address space needs in the North American region > should be, give or take, as cheap or expensive, as easy or complicated > as anywhere else. > > So this effect might only be very loosely coupled at best. > > How about assuming that the US, North America in general, is simply > again leading the pack in eventually deploying a not-so-new-any-longer > technology? They have done this already in the past, so I have heart. ;-) > > Best, > > -C. > >
