Hi,
Il 17/06/2016 07:41, Tore Anderson ha scritto:
* Elvis Daniel Velea <[email protected]>
Additionally, it would still apply retroactively and people which since
2012 until 'yesterday' were allocated PA/transferable IPs (2 years after
the moment of the allocation) will end up with an allocation that is no
longer transferable.
Elvis, while there are valid arguments against this proposal, this is
not one of them.
If it was, then we could essentially just disband the AP-GW as pretty
much every single policy proposal ever made would "apply
retroactively". Including the ones that made various forms of transfers
possible in the first place; suddenly, many old non-transferable blocks
were "retroactively" changed to become transferable.
Note that the RIPE NCC SSA says:
Article 6 – Compliance
6.1 The Member acknowledges applicability of, and adheres to, the RIPE
Policies and RIPE NCC procedural documents. The RIPE Policies and the
RIPE NCC procedural documents are publicly available from the RIPE NCC
Document Store. These documents, which may be revised and updated from
time to time, form an integral part of and apply fully to the RIPE NCC
Standard Service Agreement.
A member who believes that transferability is an immutable and
everlasting property of address space has not read what they've signed.
If this proposal truly "applied retroactively" with regards to
transfers, it would have had to annul all the transfers *made prior to
its adoption* and stated the previously transferred address space was
to be forcibly returned to its original holder or the NCC.
I do not like policy proposals that apply retroactively
Uhm, so what about your 2015-01 proposal then? That one "applied
retroactively" no less than this one.
I don't think 2015-01 apply retroactively.
I think allocation made before implementation of 2015-01 are free from
limitations.
I'll open a ticket about it and check and let you know.
Anyway. I withdraw my earlier objection to 2016-03. I'm not at all
convinced it's a good idea or worth the trouble, but if the community
really wants to go down this road I won't try to block the path.
Consider me neutral/abstaining.
Tore
regards
Riccardo
--
Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: [email protected]
Mobile: +39 339 8925947
Mobile: +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943
WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to [email protected]
Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
