Hi, On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:09:11AM +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote: > > Uhm, so what about your 2015-01 proposal then? That one "applied > > retroactively" no less than this one. > I don't think 2015-01 apply retroactively. > I think allocation made before implementation of 2015-01 are free from > limitations.
Both do not apply retroactively, as in "transfers that happened before
the proposal came into effect are nullified".
Both proposal *do* apply to all *future* transfers - regardless of the
allocation date of the to-be-transferred address space.
This is the way our policy changes have always worked: affecting future
*actions* to be done with numbers. Only one single proposal ever affected
pre-existing assignments in a big way, 2007-01 - and that was seen as
necessary (and in hindsight, given the amount of attempted fraud regarding
address blocks, it was a very good decision).
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
