If I’ve a PI for my company … and I offer WiFi for the laptops or phones of my employees, and their families and customers when they come to my office … are those assignments? Clearly they are “others”, not the same organization that got the PI.
That’s why I think we need to consider that assignment is for infrastructure, not end devices, at least this seems to be my reading of the definition. Saludos, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: address-policy-wg <[email protected]> en nombre de Tore Anderson <[email protected]> Responder a: <[email protected]> Fecha: domingo, 23 de octubre de 2016, 10:06 Para: Kai 'wusel' Siering <[email protected]> CC: "[email protected] Working Group" <[email protected]> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification) Hi Kai, * Kai 'wusel' Siering > (Which, btw, means there's no difference between PA and PI here. > Thus, End Users must not use DHCPv6 nor WiFi, with NCC'scurrent > interpretation. Eeks.) > > [...] > > And 3rd party usage of IPv6 PI addresses is currently not allowed. > > Well, if reading the policy that way, neither is it for non-PI space? I think you're right. An assignment is an assignment. If the policy currently disallows using assignments (PI or PA) for things like wireless networks for guests, then I'd say that 2016-04 doesn't go far enough. Tore ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
