Dear Yuli, > The definition exists but is anchored to subscriber-location, and it's not > obvious if it covers operationally or topologically distinct deployments, > which is what I'd value the community's view on. > > That ambiguity may have been tolerable when most deployments followed > relatively common patterns, but the wider range of deployment models in use > today makes the lack of precision more noticeable. > > Operational and deployment models have evolved considerably since the > original definition was introduced. > > I am interested in understanding whether the community believes the current > interpretation remains clear and consistently understood. > > Some areas where differing interpretations may exist include: > > • What qualifies a deployment as a distinct end-site? Physical location only, > or also operational/topological separation? > • Whether an End Site is primarily a legal entity, an organization, a > network, a physical location, a single end-user, or an operational deployment? > • How the concept applies to distributed enterprise networks spanning > multiple locations? > > I would be interested to hear views, examples, and operational experiences > from others.
Can you give the list some concrete examples of these deployment models that cause tension with the current end-site definition and/or interpretation? Providing such examples would probably be useful to serve as basis for further discussion. Best regards, Alex Le Heux APWG Co-chair ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
