-1 to having to worry about what retroweaver does and does not support,
and I certainly don't want to have to check in to two branches regularly.
Thanks,
Gabrielle
Bruno Bernard wrote:
Scott,
Maybe Trinidad does not work completly with Portlets but it seems to
have some support. It seems to work with me.
I noticed 3 things so far:
1) org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter is not being
called so the user agent is set to null. This cause an exception and
I did a workaround to see how the rest was working.
2) Partial trigger does not work
3) the custom skins does not seems to be loaded (maybe related to 1)
As of 1.4. I modified less than 10 lines of code and used retroweaver.
It worked. To keep this working we would need to just make sure that
we do not use 1.5 specific code that retroweaver does not support.
Would you guys consider a branch that supports this + JSF 1.1. Maybe I
am not the only one interested by this. Again myself and my company
would consider to contribute.
Bruno
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Bruno,
Actually, Trinidad does not yet work with portlets. :)
That being said, most of the code base was ported over from ADFFaces
which was originally written from 10.1.3. If 1.4 is a hard
requirement, you might want to look at ADFFaces again. I believe the
10.1.3.1 release has enhancements to work with the portal system.
Hopefully we'll get Trinidad up to speed very soon.
-1 to reverting the renderkit to work with 1.4. It seems to me it's
taking a step backward, especially as we (or Adam rather) ramp up to
supporting JSF 1.2.
Scott O'Bryan
Bruno Bernard wrote:
I am currently working for a company that had been using Oracle ADF
for a while and we are currently planning to move to portlets.
Since oracle ADF does not support portlets out of the box, we
decided to look more closely into Trinidad which works with Portlets.
One of our requirement is to use Java 1.4.
After looking at this page
(http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/ToDo) I tried to see how
much it was to run Trinidad on Java 1.4. It was easy and we've made
it work. We are currently thinking to go for this solution and
contribute to your project if you want.
