Scott,

Thanks for the reply and the details, this is precious information since I will need to make it work. We will not be using panelTabbed and inputFile As for the portal bridge, i am using my face. This is working for me (except that i get an exception in isIE maybe related to the bug that you are fixing). This is what i have Trinidad+jsf_facelet 1.1.6+myfaces 1.1.3+liferay 1.4.2 (with a fix i had to do)

Bruno

Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Bruno,
 We also have the following other issues:

<tr:inputFile> will not work
No PPR will work
panelTabbed will not work if PPR doesn't work
Image references will not work correctly
etc. etc. etc. The list goes on an on. The problems you are discovering now are the same problems would would have trying to run ADFFaces before the portal enhancements were added.

I don't doubt that Trinidad may run in a portal in a very limited (and inconsistant) capacity, but that does not constitute Portal support. Also, Trinidad will not work with the MyFaces bridge portlet at the moment until I check in a fix.

Do you mind me asking what bridge portlet you are using?

Scott

Bruno Bernard wrote:
Scott,

Maybe Trinidad does not work completly with Portlets but it seems to have some support. It seems to work with me.
I noticed 3 things so far:
1) org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter is not being called so the user agent is set to null. This cause an exception and I did a workaround to see how the rest was working.
2) Partial trigger does not work
3) the custom skins does not seems to be loaded (maybe related to 1)

As of 1.4. I modified less than 10 lines of code and used retroweaver. It worked. To keep this working we would need to just make sure that we do not use 1.5 specific code that retroweaver does not support. Would you guys consider a branch that supports this + JSF 1.1. Maybe I am not the only one interested by this. Again myself and my company would consider to contribute.

Bruno

Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Bruno,

Actually, Trinidad does not yet work with portlets.  :)

That being said, most of the code base was ported over from ADFFaces which was originally written from 10.1.3. If 1.4 is a hard requirement, you might want to look at ADFFaces again. I believe the 10.1.3.1 release has enhancements to work with the portal system. Hopefully we'll get Trinidad up to speed very soon.

-1 to reverting the renderkit to work with 1.4. It seems to me it's taking a step backward, especially as we (or Adam rather) ramp up to supporting JSF 1.2.

Scott O'Bryan

Bruno Bernard wrote:
I am currently working for a company that had been using Oracle ADF for a while and we are currently planning to move to portlets. Since oracle ADF does not support portlets out of the box, we decided to look more closely into Trinidad which works with Portlets.
One of our requirement is to use Java 1.4.

After looking at this page (http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/ToDo) I tried to see how much it was to run Trinidad on Java 1.4. It was easy and we've made it work. We are currently thinking to go for this solution and contribute to your project if you want.









Reply via email to