-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On July 30, 2002 20:50 pm, Wm.G.McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:04:36 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Russell McOrmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |  Ethics is a rather personal thing.  You'll want to define
> |  membership criteria for a SIG, and totally avoid the phrase
> |  'ethics'.
>
> No. You may have your personal beliefs and may even share them with
> some people, but a set of ethics is defined with respect some
> external standard by which behaviour can be measured. Developing a
> code of ethics is about a lot more than deciding how you feel about
> an issue. It's about defining how a professional group, as a whole,
> should behave.

Would you be looking for an 'ethos' then?  The disposition, character, 
or fundamental values peculiar to a specific person, people, culture, 
or movement.

> computer for any reason whatsoever. Getting caught doing so,
> advocating, instructing or supporting those who do so could be
> regarded as 'conduct unbecoming a professional'....

You wouldn't happen to be ex-military would you Bill?  I can't count the 
number of times I heard 'conduct unbecoming a member of Her Majesty's 
Canadian Forces' :)

- -- 
Live fast, die young,
you're sucking up my bandwidth.
- ------
J.P. Pasnak, CD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9R4XHBMRgzmzdk08RApjYAKC/9AB4cMBZBa7x9WlbY91LBpPVwQCfdLeq
xDM0NXalsARu61ZDy2Qq+MM=
=UPCR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to