For Windows systems, hopefully you *won't* be implemting 4.2.1.0!
Otherwise you'll see APARs IC31844 and (possibly) IC31873.
For NT-based systems, I recommend 4.2.1.15.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"Malbrough, Demetrius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/26/2001 09:33
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Scheduled NT Client Performance Problems
Thanks, Lisa! Hopefully, by the end of this week we will be implementing
4.2.1.0
on the client. I agree with you totally!
-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Cabanas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scheduled NT Client Performance Problems
Demetrius,
when we went from 3.1 to 3.7, I saw an decrease in overall backup time
from
1/3
to 1/2 the time. The old code IS slow. Tell 'em (if they care about
their
backup window) they have to upgrade, or you could tell them you called
into
support on this issue, and they said you'd have to update to a supported
code
level before they will assist ;-)
lisa
|--------+------------------------>
| | "Malbrough, |
| | Demetrius" |
| | <DMalbrough@TT|
| | IINC.COM> |
| | |
| | 11/21/2001 |
| | 09:05 AM |
| | Please respond|
| | to "ADSM: Dist|
| | Stor Manager" |
| | |
|--------+------------------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc: (bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT)
|
| Subject: Re: Scheduled NT Client Performance Problems
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
Actually, this particular node is still running ADSM 3.1.0.8! :-(
If it was up to me it would already be upgraded to 4.2.1.0 but
you have certain processes to follow...
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: ORNESS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scheduled NT Client Performance Problems
Demetrius,
what are your TCPIP settings on both sides( client / server)
How did you set TNXBYTEMILIT and other tuning stuff ?
Have your heard of Journal Based Backup (feature of 4.2.x).
If your NT box is able to handle 2 or more data sessions ?
check the RESOURCEUTILIZATION param
You can increase you TCPBUFF and TCPWINDOWSIZE to the MAX.
Send us your params... (and what kind of CPU you have in your NT box)
rv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Malbrough, Demetrius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:19 PM
Subject: Scheduled NT Client Performance Problems
> Greetings, SM'ers!
>
> I have two NT 4.0 file servers that take anywhere from 8 hrs to 16 hrs
to
> process all files & complete the backup scheduled backup.
>
> Processes: 400,000 files
> Backing up: 10,000 to 40,000
> Bytes transf: 6 GB
> NO COMPRESSION
>
> The server is an H80 7026 2 GB of memory with AIX 4.3.3 10/100 & 10/1000
> Ethernet backing up straight to disk pool. Any suggestions from anyone
with
> similiar scheduled NT backup setup please respond!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Demetrius Malbrough
> UNIX/Tivoli Systems Admin
>
