> library form?
http://pluralsight.com/wiki/default.aspx/Fritz.AspNetWithoutWebProjects
there are other tutorials, this is first one I could find :) It gives
you the idea.
Frans
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] VS ASP.NET 2005
>
> > Hi all,I was just wondering if anybody else has decided to shun the
> > new ASP.NET project model advocated by VS 2005.
> >
> > I am sticking with the VS 2003 model. It is almost like they are
> > trying to cater for ASP developers (of which I used to be one).
>
> No matter what you choose, it will suck. The problem
> is that there's not a single solution which fits all
> different website development styles. Some see a website as a
> set of loosely coupled pages, others see it as a windowsforms
> project with a different style of how you define your forms.
>
> Add to that that the application by itself isn't
> runnable, you need a HOST to run it in (webserver), with a
> viewer app to make it move (browser).
>
> > The fact that the Global.asax file in the new web project template
> > contains inline script was enough to make my skin
> > crawl. The appCode facility is unecessary.
> >
> > Partial classes are I suppose ok for compartmentalising code but
> > really a smell that your class is too big.
>
> Not necessarily. Partial classes have the advantage
> that you can use designers which generate parts of your
> classes and you have a safe way of adding your own code to
> the class in a convenient way.
>
> > Anybody who wants to stick to the superior VS 2003 model
> should look
> > no further than the following:
> > http://webproject.scottgu.com/Default.aspx
>
> I found the 2003 model also very bad, especially the
> necessity for loading the project via the webserver. As if I
> want to develop my software through a webserver. that's why I
> always choose the library form of doing websites with
> asp.net. It loads very fast and works as expected. I haven't
> done any porting of a lib based website to vs.net 2005, but I
> don't expect much problems.
>
> Frans
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com
>
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
