> > On May 6, 2008, at 13:53, Mads Toftum wrote: > > > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:47:38PM -0700, Alan > Coopersmith wrote: > >> The engineering team pretty much agrees that SPARC > support is a > >> feature > >> on the to do list that hasn't been finished yet, > not something > >> intentionally > >> omitted. > >> > > Putting it so low on the list that it couldn't even > make the first > > release does say a lot about the priorities. not > very impressive imho. > > Sorry, I disagree. Given the desktop and developer > focus of > OpenSolaris 2008.05, it seems entirely rational to > put SPARC on the > "later" list.
I'm stuck in a feeeedback loop on this one. I think you need a reality check on the marketing doublespeak :) The guy isn't impressed with what the SPARC delay says about the 2008.05 priorities. The point is: he doesn't like the priorities. He doesn't like the fact that SPARC is being neglected. But you managed to spin that into "No, given that SPARC is neglected, it makes perfect sense that SPARC is neglected!" Gad zooks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
