Alan DuBoff a ?crit : > But it is what the future Solaris will be built on, so I'm not sure what > your impilcation is with your comments.
Where is it written? Sun's employees don't even dare to say ?Solaris 11?. > S10 should continue to run fine for you, look at the milage you're touting > on your 2.5.1 server going out of commission last year. I'd say if you > could milk your S10 servers for quite a number of years before you realize > that you've been eclipsed. I wish, but the problem is, Sun is putting lots of energy into OpenSolaris, and I still lack proper support for Sun's own hardware. And many things are being fixed only in Nevada and OpenSolaris, and not Solaris. Even real, actual bugs, not only new features. > * of course my own view, not my employer. I have no insight to what Sun is > planning, but it is my understanding that future releases of Solaris would > be based on OpenSolaris, at the core. Yes, it's my view, too. So, again, where is it written? You have to be inside Sun just to know about that, and I have to follow closely the mailing list to be given those tidbits. I wonder what is the outside world view. Sun changed the definition of OpenSolaris months ago, and didn't even bother to update the project definition page. Before asking for Community help and endorsement, wouldn't some clarity be welcome? It's incredible how Sun people here seem to be so smugly knowledgeable, and the Community isn't. Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communaut? | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org |
