Le 7 mai 08 ? 00:12, MC a ?crit :
>>
>
> I'm stuck in a feeeedback loop on this one. I think you need a
> reality check on the marketing doublespeak :)
>
> The guy isn't impressed with what the SPARC delay says about the
> 2008.05 priorities. The point is: he doesn't like the priorities.
> He doesn't like the fact that SPARC is being neglected. But you
> managed to spin that into "No, given that SPARC is neglected, it
> makes perfect sense that SPARC is neglected!" Gad zooks!
And we can loop to what Laurent said :
Imagine (just imagine), in an other world where SPARC wouldn't be a
priority...it would mean backport to "Solaris TM" wouldn't be a
priority !
Could the team which fixed priorities imagine since how many time
old-Solaris-advocates are waiting for a full-ZFS-functionnal Solaris
10 ?
No ? Check for case/Bugs/CR matching :
- Zone rootpath on ZFS
- ZFS enabled LiveUpgrade
- ...
Could the team which fixed priorities imagine since how many time
old-Solaris-advocates are waiting for a full-IPinstance Solaris ?
No ? Check for case/bugs/CR matching :
- DHCP in zones
- VLANs in zones
- MTUs inzones
- ...
Know what ? You'll find many engineer talking about Nevada !
Hey ! Nevada ? What is Nevada exactly ? Future of Solaris !
Hey No ! Future of Solaris is OpenSolaris !
Hum...I'm lost. The next time I'd have to advocate would be hard !
What should I say exactly ?
Nicolas
01010101 01001110 01001001 01011000
Nicolas Dorfsman
ndo at unikservice.com
http://www.guses.org - French Speaking (Open)Solaris User Group
http://www.solaris-fr.org - French OpenSolaris Wiki
