C. Bergstr?m wrote: > Jim Grisanzio wrote: >> On 05/29/09 16:55, C. Bergstr?m wrote: >>> While I haven't stress tested clearspace community to the extent of >>> opensolaris.org traffic it's exactly what /we/ need. >> >> Cool. >> >>> I realize that Jive software products aren't open source and that >>> you're using an ancient version. >> >> We'd like to go with an open source solution, yes. > While I'm a very big advocate of open source and also working towards > removing the closed binaries. I almost find it ironic to mandate the > site be driven by an open source solution when opensolaris still ships > with non-OSI approved parts. (I guess one step at a time..)
It shouldn't be ironic. One can be easily replaced; the other not so. Both are desirable to replace, and that is a goal. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker
