Hi Randal! Thank you very much for your commentary. Now for my comments.
On Sunday 02 October 2005 14:17, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "Shlomi" == Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Shlomi> Hi good people, > Shlomi> there's a new web-site for Perl beginners - perlmeme.org - > > Shlomi> http://perlmeme.org/ > > Unless it's hidden, I'm not finding any obvious link there to the > defacto standard location for Perl beginners, <http://learn.perl.org>. That may be possible. Perlmeme.org is still under constant development, and many important content and links are missing. As far as I'm concerned a link to learn.perl.org should be added very soon, at the very least because it also contains some online books including the first edition of Beginning Perl. > I think this represents broken integrity on your part, since you > appear to be trying to replace learn.perl.org, not supplement it, so > you're attempting to fracture the community, not enhance it. Just a note: while being a perlmeme.org contributor I am by no means am leading this project. I'm sorry if I gave this impression, but my intention in the original message was to just publicize perlmeme.org. I believe Simon Taylor (CCed to this message) and other collaborators of his, are more of an authority as far as perlmeme.org is concerned. I believe they'll gladly accept any good patches to the site, either from Randal or from someone else. > > If you add a prominent link to learn.perl.org, I will withdraw my > complaint. OK. Just note that perlmeme.org is a very different site that learn.perl.org (and to some extent perl-begin.berlios.de) and they both fill different niches. I'm still looking for more contributors for perl-begin, including people who can populate its wiki with useful content: http://perl-begin.berlios.de/Wiki/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page Thanks again! Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the bottom 5%.
