I like ManFont's idea. I'm very interested to see the creative work of members who've been discussing their's. I've done a little Googling, so I have a notion of some of it, but others I have no idea.
Kathryn Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 3/19/2008 5:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: a suggestion Instead of a reading list could we not engage in the actual production of art? We could take a theme and each participating member could choose their medium of choice (painting, sculpture, music, literature, aesthetic critique, etc.) to express this theme. We could then share this body of work and explore its differences and commonalities. Fri, 6 Feb 1998 08:02:39 EST The End of Art A philosopher that spends a lifetime describing art (or anything else for that matter) may do this by limiting all that is extraneous (simplification) to ever greater levels. The mental constructs become complex within themselves (self referential) but always at the cost of inclusiveness; probably where this thing we call art resides. Finally one achieves mental closure (for this individual on this subject) and declares that art is dead/irrelevant/whatever. It is not art that has died, but the individuals simplified/contained perception of art based on their self imposed/created mental pale. Luis Fontanills Architect Miami-Dade, Florida **************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home. (http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom00 030000000001)
